User talk:BrizaICE

New theory on how a Cyclic Universe could work
For a long time now I have wondered how to present a feasible theory that would prove the universe and the big bang theory is cyclical which has previously been proposed by the likes of Einstein and Georges Lema”tre and others. which has since been disproved in modern times See below.

the oscillating universe theory briefly considered by Albert Einstein in 1930 theorized a universe following an eternal series of oscillations, each beginning with a big bang and ending with a big crunch; in the interim, the universe would expand for a period of time before the gravitational attraction of matter causes it to collapse back in and undergo a bounce.

In 1931, Lemaitre proposed in his "hypotheses de l'atome primitif" (hypothesis of the primeval atom) that the universe began with the "explosion" of the "primeval atom" - what was later called the Big Bang. Lemaitre first took cosmic rays to be the remnants of the event, although it is now known that they originate within the local galaxy. Lemaitre had to wait until shortly before his death to learn of the discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation, the now believed remnant radiation of a dense and hot phase in the early Universe.

My question to myself was what force could possible stop the expansion universe so that it would then turn around and implode on itself

My theory is that once the universe cools and all particles that go to making up the universe freezes then there will be a new stage that has been unheard of where not only the dead planets suns galaxies freeze but space or dark matter itself will freeze and form a solid mass. A solid mass the size of the universe would itself create an astronomical gravitational pull that would cause the universe to implode in on itself and hence creating the new big bang cycle

Brian Rees

26/01/13

My Theory on how Mars lost its water
It's already been suggested that there was an earlier period in the solar systems existence where the orbits of the planets where some what erratic and could have actually crossed paths.

I believe at one point in time Earth and Mars had their paths cross and a collision caused mars to lose most of its water and Earth ended up with a lot of mars water.

The most important thing to understand is the type of collision which i believe was no a direct center hit but a Kiss type snooker collision where the planets were held up momentarily (in the astronomical sense) and through inertia the both planets water keeps moving along the same direction of the orbit paths.

Because earth was closer to the sun and because mars veered away from the sun and earth was on an inside path it gathered most of the water and mars was left with less

This Idea I have since 2000

Brian Rees December 2018

Venus could be the proof of a Global Warming Disaster caused be its planets inhabitants THEORY
Venusian or Venerian is the name used to describe an inhabitant of the planet Venus which is realy hard to get our head around as the planet is so hot its impossible to for any live form to live. But I am not talking about the Venusoids (the name I have come up with for the description of venus inhabitants) of today im talking about Venusoids that MAY have existed some 2 billion years ago.

Firstly I believe there has been billions of "planet inhabitant caused" Global Warming Disasters throughout the 14 billion year history of the Universe.

My proof is the simple numerous commonalities found in the universe ... Billions of galaxies >>> Billions of Suns >>> Billions of planets >>> Billions of planets with life forms >>> Billions of Now or once inhabited planets of ARROGANT Intelligent Beings.

Of Which Venus could be the proof of my theory.

The Earth has been in its latest habitable state for the last 10 to 14 million years which is a like one second in earths 4 billion year history.

There Is Evidence that venus developed or cooled much faster than earth within the first 1 billion yeas whereas earth took more than 2 or 3 billion years.

So taking the safe Average of 20 million years of time it would take for the menagerie of life to develop on a planet and the 7 million year example of humans from tree dwellers to intelligent beings of today it is not impossible for an intelligent life form to develop towards the end of the first billion years of Venuses existence.

Then using the dog eat dog example that all forms of life have endured on this planet and how this is probably responsible for the Arrogance that is apart of the human race its most probable that a Venusoid race would probably be just as arrogant.

Arrogant enough to overpopulate their planet like a plague and upset the natural growth progress of the planet causing way to much pollution and this is the result we see now.

I don't think global warming is the problem!!!

I believe Global population is the problem and Im NOT saying reducing the population is the answer.

I am saying unless 10 Billion people on a planet is not carefully managed and addressed then the earth will go the way of billions of planets of arrogant beings.

Again this idea is is about 10 years old Brian Rees 2018 December 07