User talk:Bro Dude51

September 2018
Hello, I'm Denniss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Qatar Airways have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Denniss (talk) 18:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Qatar Airways. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 20:12, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Warning
Please dont attack other users or you will be blocked from editing. I have given you the benefit of the doubt as you are new and not blocked you straight away for you edit summaries on Qatar Airways but if you make any sort of threat, intimidation or attack on other editors you may not get another warning. Have a read of No personal attacks and consider how to treat others here. If you have an issue then you need to raise it on the article talk page, take care and please think before you type. MilborneOne (talk) 17:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been undoing this york so just put the pics back. There is no overload.

Bro Dude51

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mjroots (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello. I was making distruptive edits but I was not noticing it while making the edits. I was trying my best, but I should to it undistruptively.


 * Despite the refusal to unblock after your second request here, it does seem that you might realise why your editing was disruptive.
 * Many aircraft and airline articles already have sufficient images in them. So, the question of what images to use comes down entirely to the image's quality and encyclopedic value. It does not matter who took the image (OK, I've not checked whether or not the following applies here), some editors edit war to get images they have taken into articles, even when their images are of inferior quality. Regardless of this, some of your edits could be construed as edit warring.
 * If you are willing to give an undertaking not to flood articles with images, then I am willing to unblock. However, should you return to previous behaviour a block may be reapplied without warning by any admin.
 * If you want to replace any images in aircraft/airline articles, it would probably be best to make a suggestion on the article's talk page. Suggested images may either be posted there, or linked to by adding a colon before the word "File" in the Wikilink. Mjroots (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I've de-activated this unblock request as it appears you have already been unblocked. SQL Query me!  07:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Now that you have been unblocked, you may remove the block notices and appeals if you wish. Mjroots (talk) 20:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * As expected, unblocking was not a good idea. You may want to see the Qatar Airways and Qatar Airways fleet history. This user keeps doing exactly what they did before the block. By taking a look at this it seems this user took the unblock as an endorsement of their actions.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 15:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Since this user is blocked it seems appropriate to block too.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 16:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * As you resumed doing the exact same thing that you were doing that got you blocked in violation of the agreement above, I am reimposing the block. 331dot (talk) 15:10, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Beat me to it. Good block. SQL Query me!  15:10, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh well, you just can't help some people. Can't say that there wasn't fair warning given. Mjroots (talk) 15:13, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * @, user is making personal attacks on talk page - recommend revoking talk page editing privileges. Kirbanzo (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * there's more than one way to skin a rabbit. Mjroots (talk) 16:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 16:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. 331dot (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Just to note for anybody reviewing unblock requests, suspected sockpuppet User:178.153.111.2 has been intimidating other users at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation. MilborneOne (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 15:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)