User talk:Brochon99/Archives1

Speedy deletion of Centre des arts Juliette-Lassonde
A tag has been placed on Centre des arts Juliette-Lassonde requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thanks, George D. Watson  (Dendodge). Talk Help and assistance 22:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Victor Diaz Lamich
Another editor has added the  template to the article Victor Diaz Lamich, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Image-CAAlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Image-CAAlogo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Everest Peace Project
I have nominated Everest Peace Project, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Everest Peace Project. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Toddst1 (talk) 01:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Prophase Music
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Prophase Music, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Wp:NN record label. Peter Pan Speedrock's article says they're on a different label, Erik Mongrain is being discussed on AFD as an WP:NN artist.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Toddst1 (talk) 19:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 04:42, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Erik Mongrain/medias
I have nominated Erik Mongrain/medias, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Erik Mongrain/medias. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. J Milburn (talk) 12:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

An article you created is about to be deleted: Tools which can help you
The article you created, Erik_Mongrain/medias is about to be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/Erik_Mongrain/medias.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important. There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
 * 1) You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2) You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
 * 3) When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept. Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
 * 4) You can merge the article into a larger article.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 17:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Article inclusion
Hi Antaya, the key to article inclusion is wp: notability. Basically citation to substantial coverage from reliable sources is needed. Happy New Year. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:12, 29 December 2008 (UTC)