User talk:Brockuk

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Daniel Brocklebank, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Daniel Brocklebank was changed by Brockuk (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-29T10:32:06+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Brockuk - it looks like the bot reacted either to the word "Devil" (in "Devil's Arithmetic") or possibly to the last part of the name "Schmuel Lubitch". In either case your edit was clearly not vandalism. Thank you for your contributions, and please stay around and keep editing :-) --Bonadea (talk) 10:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Daniel Brocklebank image 99.jpeg
Thank you for uploading Image:Daniel Brocklebank image 99.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 11:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Another welcome - any questions?

 * Hi there, and welcome to wikipedia. There are, perhaps, a few things you should know:


 * 1) Although everyone is welcome to edit on wikipedia, we do have some rules about conflict of interest that perhaps you should read. Generally, while we welcome corrections to information about yourself; it is preferable if they are raised on the talk page of an article - and be referenced to a suitable periodical - for instance, bio in Guardian, or some such.
 * 2) Thank you for uploading a publicity photo of yourself, unfortunately material that is uploaded to wikipedia cannot retain copyright, and you may wish to remove anything that you feel you want to retain rights to. If you have a photograph that you don't feel strongly about, that you are happy to release into the public domain - that would be better.
 * I hope that goes some way to resolving some questions that may arise from all these notices you're receiving. If you have any questions, or need any help - please feel free to contact me. Kbthompson (talk) 19:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Daniel Brocklebank 2009.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Daniel Brocklebank 2009.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains (talk) 06:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Dan Brocklebank image 64.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Dan Brocklebank image 64.jpeg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Daniel Brocklebank. London. September 2007.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Brocklebank. London. September 2007.jpeg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Daniel Brocklebank.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Brocklebank.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)