User talk:Brocooli

Welcome!
Hello, Brocooli, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Media Mania, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eman 235 / talk 20:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Media Mania


The article Media Mania has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Most likely fails the general notability guideline, and "plot" section was evidently taken from the source it's referencing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eman 235 / talk 20:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Charlotte's Web (1973 film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Velella  Velella Talk 00:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Using the thanks button
I have no idea what you think you are playing at but you need to stop thanking me for edits I made years ago. So far you have thanked me for about 80 edits to Barney and Friends all of which date from 2007 - 2010. In fact you need to stop using the thanks button altogether. Continuing to do so will end with you being blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Not trying to talk back at you or anything, but calm down. Look, i'll won't overuse the thanks button. there. happy (sheesh, relax)My girl wants to party all the time, party all the time, party all the time 00:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello. As others have noted above, when you make a change to an article in this encyclopedia, you must cite reliable, published sources. See WP:V for more information about why the encyclopedia requires sources. If you do not cite your sources, your additions and changes may be removed, as I removed your recent additions at BrainPop. You may restore the information if you properly reference it. See WP:CITE for more information about citing sources. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Wikia is not a reliable source. You need sources like newspapers or regularly published magazines. --  Ssilvers (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Well there are no other sources other than wikia. That's all there is. My girl wants to party all the time, party all the time, party all the time 22:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Ready jet go
Please quote reliable sources proving notabilty of the subject.Xx236 (talk) 13:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

No personal attacks
Hi, I'm an administrator at the English Wikipedia. Your comments here are inappropriate. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Your absurd statement "Don't be some kid with autism" and "if you don't, people will think your some kid with autism who likes deleting things for no reason" are grossly disrespectful and degrading not only to FilmandTVFan28, but also to autistic people who already have a tough gig. Seriously? You couldn't think of a better way to explain why edit summaries are important? Wikipedia does not tolerate incivility. This is a community editing project comprising millions of people from all backgrounds and skill sets and you should keep that well in mind if you elect to edit here. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, when I first heard about Jacob, I thought he was one of those Vandal with autism. But looking at it now, and after reading Palface Jack's reply, I felt really bad. And what makes me feel even bad is that I have Autism. I just that I have a history of saying things before I think. It's just that my brain like seeing what happens when i say this.BBC, Broke my Knee, Turtle Pee 20:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Washington Week. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Diffs:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was a little nuts after reading Paleface Jack's reply to here.BBC, Broke my Knee, Turtle Pee 20:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Завтрак на траве (фильм)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Завтрак на траве (фильм) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  02:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas Kuc


The article Thomas Kuc has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cree Cicchino


The article Cree Cicchino has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Kuc


A tag has been placed on Thomas Kuc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cree Cicchino


A tag has been placed on Cree Cicchino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 20:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Brocooli, I deleted the article on Cree. We cannot have unsourced biographies - please don't create any more, even if you are translating an unsourced bio from another language Wikipedia. All bios here need at least one reference to a reliable source like a newspaper or book. Remember that Cree is only a young teen and we cannot risk having an article about her without good sources backing what we say. If we cannot find these sources, it is best to have no article at all. We do this to protect the subjects of the articles. So - if you want to write articles about living people, get searching for good quality sources that discuss the subject in detail. Fences  &amp;  Windows  23:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Same with Thomas Kuc. You need to be sure that articles are well-referenced, and if you plan to create any article, you need to establish that the subject is notable, either per our general notability guideline (which you'd have to support with ample references from several mainstream publications) or per our more specific notability criteria. For actors, the specific notability criteria is WP:NACTOR, which states that at the very least you need to demonstrate that the subject has had significant roles in "multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Any failure to accomplish this will result in articles being deleted. It's the bare-minimum effort that needs to be expended. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Maya & Miguel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: Your statement "This is the only pre-2013 PBS Kids show not to be re-edited for the current PBS Kids" needs to be sourced, lest it be construed as original research. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Clubjustin Talkosphere  00:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Alyson Court. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Diff: You've had ample time to learn how to provide references. Any more lazy editing like this will very likely result in your privileges being interrupted. If the subject has a verified Twitter account and you have a link to the post that confirms the information, then add the reference. Your words "Yep...She done it (Source was her twitter)" is of no value, since readers aren't going to check the edit history to find references.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Please remember to sign your talk page posts
Re: this, please remember to sign your talk page posts in the future by typing four tildes like ~. It will append your name and a date stamp like this → Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hill-Fields Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve White. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Notes Alive!


The article Notes Alive! has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable series of videos/films."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  16:57, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shukriyah Kifi


A tag has been placed on Shukriyah Kifi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 2A00:23EE:2678:4134:583B:A1FF:FE9B:452B (talk) 19:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Nicole Schwartz and Friends. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. 2A00:23EE:2678:4134:583B:A1FF:FE9B:452B (talk) 19:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Nicole Schwartz and Friends moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Nicole Schwartz and Friends, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 20:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nicole Schwartz and Friends


Hello, Brocooli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nicole Schwartz and Friends".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  00:48, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)