User talk:Broden

William Adams (judge)
Consider this version. Most of what you are adding has been removed per WP:BLP and WP:ATTACK. What is needed is well-sourced information about the judge's career aside from the scandal. / edg ☺ ☭ 19:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I would question the need for a Wikipedia article for Adams, as there appears to be no sources available in regards to his career. Broden (talk) 19:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * A glancing Google search found some blog/forum sources that cannot be used. I didn't look much further, so I don't know if he is more newsworthy. / edg ☺ ☭ 20:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of planets in the habitable zone


A tag has been placed on List of planets in the habitable zone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. → Σ  τ  c. 23:00, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fugitive (Video Game)


A tag has been placed on Fugitive (Video Game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 06:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

"megatrhrust"
Hi there. I did not edit that information -- check the article history. Best yet, correct it. Best regards, --Mareklug talk 10:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You're obviously not a very experienced editor, to judge from your missives to me and your talk page. Kindly give me some slack.  We are all editing at once, and it behooves you to keep your accusations to minimum, esp. when they are baseless.  --Mareklug talk 10:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GamingXP


The article GamingXP has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 00:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)