User talk:BrokenSphere/Archive 2

Featured picture candidates/USS Bunker Hill hit by two Kamikazes.jpg
Hi BrokenSphere,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:USS Bunker Hill hit by two Kamikazes.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-12-16.  howcheng  {chat} 17:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Curious about MOH pics
I was just wondering why you're removing MOH pics from articles like Thomas J. Reeves. Thanks. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 01:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

you contact me
Please be so patient and check the external links before you claim them as spam. All links I put refering to object Information. As this is a private and a non commercial external link wikipedia should not delete this informtaions.

Please be so patient and check the external links before you claim them as spam. All links I put refering to object Information. As this is a private and a non commercial external link wikipedia should not delete this informtaions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superaj (talk • contribs) 08:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

missing Informations
All the missing Informations about the Artist on Breakin 1 + 2 are on this site. Pls let me know how to make it better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superaj (talk • contribs) 08:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar
for the barnstar. The FP standard can be rather harsh at times, all the more so for historic paintings and photographs. It's a shame really, because it was an iconic painting. Oh well, there's always next time :) -- Chris.B 10:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

E-Mail Concerns
Hey thanks for the advice on leaving my e-mail vulnerable to spam. I don't have to worry much, though. The spam filters in Gmail are top notch so I don't worry too much about spam. Oh and I fixed the code for the message bar. Just had to put an underscore between Maverick and Leonhart. The space messes up the script. Thanks for pointing that out to me. It would be bad if Amarrg got my messages and I didn't. Well, thanks again. Catch ya later. Maverick Leonhart (Talk | Contribs) 14:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Image reverts
Got your message. I'm not terribly concerned with the "three revert rule" in this case. Whoever this is is going against what Wikipedia's Highest of High Chief Muckamucks have established as policy for the project, and if it keeps up and anyone wants to try to raise a ruckus about 3RR, they have only to look at my reasons for undoing the edits and the discussion page. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 15:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Re:WP:Bio assessment drive
I forgot to add my nominations until 2 days after dead line. Does it still counts? KGV (Talk) 05:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Apologies for the delayed response
I suppose a successful FP nom would work for a triple crown, although I'd like to see that in conjunction with other effort such as adding it to appropriate articles and/or excellent caption writing. Durova Charge! 17:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Ranma½ Items Page
Have there been any improvements with the re-establishment of the Ranma½ items list? Dave 17:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)
The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

RE: End of WP:Bio assessment drive
Thanks for the heads up. I posted my opinion. - • The Giant Puffin •  16:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree. 1000 articles takes quite a while. - • The Giant Puffin •  17:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

3rd Opinion
I'm certainly willing to submit this to anywhere you would like. Perhaps, as this is an art oriented issue, bringing the discussion to the notice of the people at WikiProject Visual arts would be a good idea. That said, I honestly don't see that there is consensus for a change here. There have four editors take part in the discussion, two for a change and two against. In addition, since the gallery was added there have been 8 logged in users and 4 anons edit the article. None has seen fit to challenge the existence of the gallery, and 3 of the named users and one of the anons made edits directly relating to the gallery. Given that silence implies consent, it would seem that the current consensus for the article is that the gallery is a good thing. Dsmdgold 03:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Team Fallen
HOW COME U KEEP PUTTING TAGS ON MY TEAM FALLEN ARTICLE....ITS ABOUT A CLAN!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ephenix1234 (talk • contribs) 05:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

You found my secret page
--Pupster21 Talk To Me 11:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

WP meetup
-- phoebe/ (talk) 07:14, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Secret Page
Here you go. Im sorry about bieng so late but I have been busy with other things.--DestructoTalk to me 03:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Awards
I'll try to discuss it with him today or tomorrow. I've been putting it off so I'll try to get it done soon. I might try and put together a newsletter soon, since it has been months since the last one was sent out. Thanks for reminding me,  Psych  less   23:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Codelyoko193
I can read it just fine. I know some people may not like it, but hey, red is my favorite color! Thanks, Codelyoko193  Talk 00:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Do you have any DYKs or GAs?
Nope. I have a generally poor opinion of the GA process, and try to avoid interacting with it. Kirill 01:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

RE:Vandal fighting - warnings
Thank you for the message. I understand. Oda Mari 17:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I have updated The Transhumanist's Award Centre to answer your question. Auroranorth 03:00, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * That still counts as one vandal warning, whether you revert it or someone gets to it first. Auroranorth 03:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Ahem...
I think you did Bobisbob a disservice. :) His edit was valid, it gave an external link a name (its the name of the page actually). -- Fullstop 01:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Ibend.info
May I please ask what is wrong with my wiki I'm making?

You say that it is a advertisement, it is not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibend (talk • contribs) 03:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Since there is already a vote on the deletion of Ibend.info running, would you be willing to let that run its course instead of this contested speedy delete? Group consensus might be more convincing, even though you and I would agree on speedy.  Mbisanz 04:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * If you check the article history, I AfD' it, he deleted the AfD, then you and Zetawoof did Speedys, which he first deleted, then you restored, then I restored the AfD, then he contested the Speedy. Really not sure what proper procedure is here.  Would a Conflict of Interest Notice be in order or is there something else either of us can do?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbisanz (talk • contribs) 04:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

You have me very confused
I added in what I thought were appropriate links for the subject matter I was reading about. I don't understand why you pulled them down. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msprozac (talk • contribs) 03:58, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Akari and Hikaru
While a literal translation of Hikaru meaning "light" is correct, it is not relevant to the character. "Flashing brillance" is an artistic translation that has no basis to be used in Gosenkugi's bio.

Akari, on the other hand, is written in Hiragana and does not have any standard meaning without the kanji characters.

Sometimes, names are just names. Ranma isn't a wild horse; Shampoo doesn't wash hair.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.45.148.219 (talk • contribs) 13:43, October 8, 2007

Ranma images being pulled
Hiya. I just thought I'd give you a heads-up that lots of images are currently being pulled, or are in danger of being pulled, for a very silly reason. The format has been modified to require providing a direct link to the referral page in question at the top. Several nice images on the minor characters page have already gone down, and I'm recurrently auto-'threatened' for the ones at "musabetsu kakuto ryu", and "fighting techniques". I pasted a standardisation on a few of them, but I'm out of time right now, and if you could find some people willing to go through all the Ranma images one by one to modify to the current required format (paste a link to the page they are used in) that would be great. Thanks. Dave 17:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Btw: I remembered the name of the fourth regular Ranma-editor that I know of, which you asked for a month back or so. Her handle is Kudoshido. Dave 17:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

The removed character images
I am talking with the Wikipedia editor about possible mitigation/compromise regarding the complete removals. Please see this talk page: User talk:Rettetast Dave 17:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Images
You can go to this page, and copy my codes. If you need more help, just ask! :) Dreamy   §  21:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help
Thanks for taking care of that Serb Chetniks Rescue U.S. Pilots during World War II and Operation Halyard. It's appreciated. SWik78 02:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Image removed from userbox
Well that's made the userbox pretty useless, so I requested that it be deleted.

This is another example of free-use policy gone wrong. I don't know why some people are we so scared of corporate lawyers? If you consider the number of companies who try to blatently advertise their products here, I would have thought they would be pleased someone was recognising their product. In the case of this userbox, there are perhaps a dozen who would use it - a dozen fans who watch the show, buy the DVDs etc. Free advertising is, well, free. Astronaut 18:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The image is OK, but it's not from the show. All the images on the Planetes article are "fair-use" so I can't use them.  The trouble is, I just don't understand the reasoning behind the policy.  I'm sure it's been debated long ago so I probably wouldn't succeed in getting the policy changed, but some explanation in the policy as to why such a rule exists would be useful.
 * As for using text instead, I started developing the userbox and then decided to add it to the list at Userboxes/Anime. In asking a question on the talk page, I found another user had already created a similar userbox but with text instead (obviously knowing the policy better than me).  My userbox is not really different enough to stand on it's own.  Astronaut 19:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

military history
Why did you add Christian X of Denmark as a subject for the military history wikiproject? Denmark was never even at war during his reign, as far as I'm aware - it immediately surrendered to Germany in 1940, without any resistance. This seems a most tenuous inclusion. john k 01:40, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

No, an occupation does not constitute a state of war. Note the wikipedia article Participants in World War II: ''Denmark remained neutral from the outbreak of the war. It was invaded and occupied by Germany on 9 April 1940, as part of Operation Weserübung, surrendering after a few hours of fighting and never declaring war on the Germans. The Danish government remained in office in Copenhagen until 1943 and signed the Anti-Comintern Pact.'' This is, so far as I know from other sources, correct. After 1943, the ministry resigned, but the permanent secretaries took over the ministries, and the Danish government continued to operate. Iceland and Greenland were occupied by the Allies at the same time, and I've never heard anyone claim that that makes Denmark a belligerent on the Axis side. An analogous case would be Marie-Adélaïde, Grand Duchess of Luxembourg, who reigned in Luxembourg during the German occupation during World War I. I note she is not (yet) in the military history wikiproject. Beyond that, the military history project should be concerned with military history - articles on significant military commanders, battles, wars, military technology, and so forth. Including the political leader of a country which happened to be tangentially involved in a war seems like a vast expansion of the scope of this project. john k 17:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

The Danes did not resist at all. Their army never fought, diplomatic relations were never broken. They signed the Anti-Comintern Pact. A state of war never existed between Germany and Denmark, as the Danes acquiesced in the German invasion. Note the difference between Denmark's situation and that of Vichy France. Vichy France was considered to be stil in a state of war with Germany - there was only an armistice. French prisoners of war were not to be released until a final peace treaty, and France was not allowed to sign the Anti-Comintern Pact. Why does the German occupation of Denmark, which was acquiesced in, count as an act of war, while the British occupation of the Faroe Islands and Iceland and the American occupation of Greenland, equally acquiesced in, do not count? The British takeover of Iceland and the Faroe Islands provoked, so far as I can tell, nearly as much protest and resistance as the German takeover of the metropole, and in Greenland, the agreement that allowed the Americans to come in was signed by the Danish ambassador in the US in violation of the orders of his government. That the Germans conducted military operations in and from Denmark is irrelevant. Throughout modern European history countries have served as the scene of wars which they were not themselves a part of. So it seems that, at best, Denmark was an allied power for a good sixteen hours - we agree, I'm sure, that they were not one before, but given that there was no declaration of war, that Denmark's government continued to function under occupation, and even joined the Anti-Comintern Pact, I find it hard to see how Denmark could be considered an allied power after the surrender. There is no other country, so far as I am aware, that was in Denmark's position. The governments of Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Norway, Greece, and Yugoslavia all went into exile. Any role that Denmark, as a state (rather than as a territory in which operations were conducted) played in the war can, indeed, best be described as "highly marginal". Given that Christian X never commanded any troops in battle, that Denmark's resistance lasted a grand total of 16 hours, and was not afterwards considered to have constituted a war (i.e., diplomatic relations were maintained, and no need was felt for a peace treaty), I don't see what business he has to be considered a military leader. john k 19:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. It just seems to me that if an article is going to be in a wikiproject, there should be some meaningful areas in which the projects core competency can contribute to the article. In this case, it seemed like there really wasn't any. john k 22:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

When do you sleep?!
5000+ edits in July. My God! You truly are a Wikipediholic!

It is therefore my proud honor to bestow upon you the following awards:

You have achieved the rank of Wikipedia Yeoman. Congratulations!

But for going beyond the call of duty, and becoming thoroughly addicted to Wikipedia and sacrificing the better part of your summer...

belated thanks
Thank you for the nice Special Barnstar you gave me on July 7th! I appreciate it! I didn't reply sooner because I have been away. Herostratus (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

With gratitude

 * {| style="background: transparent; width: 90%; font-size: 90%;"


 * width="45%" |
 * width="45%" |
 * - valign="top"
 * - valign="top"
 * }
 * Here's a replacement neater version. Doesn't make your userpage look quite so much like the day after a garbage party:) -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 15:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * - valign="top"
 * }
 * Here's a replacement neater version. Doesn't make your userpage look quite so much like the day after a garbage party:) -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 15:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * }
 * Here's a replacement neater version. Doesn't make your userpage look quite so much like the day after a garbage party:) -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 15:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Branded to Kill on front page
Thanks for the barnstar and the comments. It's obviously my favourite of his films and the vandalism on the article today has been nice—in that it indicates it's been getting some attention—but you've topped that, I'm glad it could open up the film some for you. That's exactly the kind of thing I was hoping for when writing the article. I'll also recommend Fighting Elegy, it's probably the last (and best) of his straighter films. Sort of a teen sex comedy meets political satire. And Tokyo Drifter always plays well when I show it around. Those articles still need some work though. Thanks again and, agreed, Misako is a hottie. Doctor Sunshine  talk  21:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Easy, if he stopped wandering the theme song wouldn't make sense anymore. Really, it's sort of a genre convention, I think. The romantic drifter. Hopefully I'll get a chance to fill that one out some. The Seijun Suzuki article will probably be my next project, though, as I started working on it back when I started with Wikipedia. Though real life calls as well. Doctor Sunshine   talk  09:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Triple crown
Hi, actually the nominations go to my user talk page. I noticed the one you posted and moved it there. Will review soon. Durova Charge! 07:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Marmalade Boy minor characters
I have nominated List of Marmalade Boy minor characters, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of Marmalade Boy minor characters. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. AnmaFinotera (talk) 05:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikiquote name change
As per Kalki's instructions on the Wikiquote village pump, I'm asking that my username there be changed from BrokenS to BrokenSphere. -- Broken Sphere Msg me 19:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I just noticed your email. After I changed your name from BrokenS to BrokenSphere at Wikiquote, I recreated the old account name and blocked it as part of standard procedures. I might have inadvertently blocked your IP in doing so, and if that is the case I could modify the block on the old name. Indicate here if you are currently having any problems, and I will do what I can there. ~ Kalki (talk) 03:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The block on that particular IP should have expired by now. It was a work IP, and now it being the weekend, I've been editing from home.  Thanks for the message.  -- Broken Sphere Msg me 06:03, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

I thought I was done?
I thought I had finished handing out awards. It appears I was wrong. I was without a computer for about a month and have been very involved in Wikisource recently, so that's why I haven't been very active lately. Just tell me what awards need to be handed out and I'll be more than happy to hand them out.  Psych  less   23:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I apologize for not getting these to you sooner. Here they are:

Happy editing.  Psych  less   23:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:AniDB anime
No, it shouldn't be there. I guess everyone was too lazy to put it up for deletion when that discussion happened, though the link was removed from Template:Anime-links. (There's also a similar template, Template:AniDB-A, if you're of a mind to start the TfD.) —TangentCube, Dialogues 18:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Les Invalides volley/organ/whatever gun
I just checked my e-mail, and no dice. I wouldn't hold my breath. What I did what write to the only address I could find, which was their press office. They might have forwarded it to the Army Museum and are waiting for a reply from them, I don't know. Or it could be that my bad French offended them so much that they roundfiled it.

I forget, is the picture in Commons now or what? I sent them a link to the question on the desk, and if I try again, I'll need to refer to the pic. --Milkbreath (talk) 17:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

RCP Part 2
As of right now, there is no limit on the number of barnstars I plan to hand out. I realize just how big this could be, but I am particularly famous for my extremely liberal use of barnstars here on Wikipedia and, besides this, I do not believe many people will notice the challenge. I also believe that the standards I set are deserving of an anti-vandalism barnstar, regardless of who awards them.

Whatever it takes to fight vandalism, right? :-P

-- Shark face  217  22:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Rome: Total War
Hi, I don't know if you play the game, but I recall you and me adding a section about Family. Do you know when a captain becomes the "man of the hour"? I've sent a captain against rebels many times but I only had man of the hour once. Do you know how? Mallerd (talk) 22:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay thanks! Mallerd (talk) 11:14, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Do you also know when the general's bodyguard is upgraded to armourded bodyguard? This only happens sometimes, especially with Parthia it is frustrating to have that silly bodyguard instead of cataphracts. Perhaps you can help me out? Thanks Mallerd (talk) 11:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I had a general with 3 silver chevrons and from one battle to another he got a armoured bodyguard, without earning more experience. Besides, every other family member, experienced or not, recieves the new bodyguard. I thought it came with the Marian Reforms, because suddenly I was fighting at legionnaires when I got them. But on the other hand, I played Scipii all the way with the Marian Reforms, but without an armoured bodyguard. Thanks for your help, Mallerd (talk) 11:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Z Special Unit
My apologies for contravening the policies of Wikipedia regarding my edit yesterday. I note that other books are mentioned on this page:

Bibliography

Harrisson, Tom. (1959). World Within. A Borneo Story. Cresset Press: London. Horton, Dick (1983) Ring of Fire: Australian Guerilla Operations Against the Japanese in World War II London: Leo Cooper/Secker and Warburg

Are these not classed as "adding promotional material to the article"???

I would like to include some information regarding the New Zealand effort on this page. How best can I do that?

Any help you can give me will be much appreciated.

Pctutorweb (talk) 21:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pctutorweb (talk • contribs) 21:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Vi Daley
How can you claim that an edit is inapropriate and POV-ish if you are not even familiar with the topic? The 'Vi Daley' page is pure political advertising put out by a 2 bit, municipal pol, and it was already voted for deletion. It should be permanently voided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.211.3.8 (talk) 22:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:BarnSakura
Thanks =) Watching the anime is usually the fun part, although finding the episodes sometimes is a problem. Feel free to comment at the nomination for List of Myself ; Yourself episodes currently at WP:FLC. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 05:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * YuYu Hakusho was an exception, as I had watched the dubbed version on television, thus I could get away with the summaries. But yeah, a lot of the ones I do (or am doing recently) are newer ones, as it's easier to watch only 12-14 episodes instead of 70-80 (although the 70-80 could be split into multiple seasons). Also, for others, I have to wait until the dub is over (List of Bleach Soul Society: The Rescue arc episodes and List of Naruto episodes (seasons 5-6)) before finishing them and sending them off to WP:FLC. In any case, if you want to improve episode lists in a similar fashion, then go ahead. I'll be more than happy to copy-edit and other fixes in order to help you along (given that I would have likely not watched that anime). Cheers, Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 05:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

League of Copyeditors roll call
Melon ‑ Bot  ( STOP! )  17:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Eric Koston
Most of the copied information has been removed. I can re-work the intro which was also copied. After that it probably will no longer apply.Montco (talk) 18:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * You're quite welcome. -- Shark face  217  22:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks for the recognition! Nick Martin (talk) 22:55, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

30 year block.
Yes, that's the maximum amount of time. It's basically the same as an indefinite block, but more lenient (that sounds funny, but it's technically true :P). · AndonicO Talk 01:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Glad to amuse you (hopefully the likely-teenaged vandal will return when they're forty-something). :) · AndonicO Talk 01:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Exactly. ;) · AndonicO Talk 01:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

AIV report
Administrator intervention against vandalism is a page for reporting users who are persistent and active in vandalising, not to report user name policy violations. Reports like this should be made at Usernames for administrator attention.  Spebi  02:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandal fighting stuff
I checked your contribs and did some research on the vandals. I didn't see all 20, but I saw enough. :-P

and

Thanks for the hard work. -- Shark face  217  04:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Nah, I'm good. There's a reason why I do more barnstar awarding for vandal fighting than actual vandal fighting. :-P -- Shark face  217  04:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll look him up. Thanks for the heads up. I rarely do vandal fighting because it's difficult and annoying (as well as taking time out of my other contributions to the project, mainly article writing and bureaucratic junk). I might do some vandal fighting tonight, as the Recent Changes seem to be on fire with vandals. -- Shark face  217  04:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * As much as vandal fighting is enjoyable and saves articles, I prefer trying to save articles at WP:AFD. Vandalism can easily be undone, but once an article is canned forever, it's gone. I've seen tons of good articles be thrown out and have to be rewritten from scratch simply because of the political views of some members, ethnocentrism (mostly in the form of I'm an American and this article isn't something I generally care or no about and am too lazy to do a Google Scholar search), crap arguments about notability, whatever. I mostly do the burecratic stuff because a good deal many Wikipedians have an "us vs. them" mentality or some sort of God-complex because of the powers given to all members. It's tough business and vandal-fighting gets the short end of the stick. -- Shark face  217  04:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)