User talk:Bromels

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Rkitko (talk) 02:14, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Pepinia bulbosa
A tag has been placed on Pepinia bulbosa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:16, 20 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, Bromels! I've restored the article in question. Such stubs do indeed meet our criteria for inclusion and I don't think this speedy deletion was warranted. I have added a bit of information, though, to give you an idea of what might be included to avoid this problem in the future. You could certainly at least mention where the species is native or endemic to and inclusion of a reference might be helpful. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help as you figure out how to navigate and build articles on Wikipedia. To start, you can take note of some of the changes I made on the Pepinia bulbosa article to get an idea of what's typically expected of new plant articles. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 17:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Portea alatisepala
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Portea alatisepala, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://fcbs.org/butcher/Portea_alatisepala_vs_Aechmea_rubrolilacina.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:40, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Typo in Greigia articles
Hi Bromels. It looks like the template you are using to create Greigia articles contains a typo: They all read "in endemic to", instead of "is endemic to". Just a headsup. Gonzonoir (talk) 12:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Bromels (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations
The Special Barnstar

Autoreviewer
Hi Bromels, as you are currently very active at article creation, have you considered nominating yourself for autoreviewer status at Requests for permissions/Autoreviewer? That way your articles won't be reviewed by the new page patrollers.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  11:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Cultivar articles
Hi, Bromels! Wow, you've been prolific in article creation. Nice job! I did wonder if perhaps you could take the time to move all the new cultivar articles you created to the format that includes the quotes, e.g. like I just did with Tillandsia Wo to Tillandsia 'Wo'. Most of our cultivar articles follow that format, though there's no specific convention spelled out anywhere. And I gather that this format is typical for most horticultural trades - is it different for Bromeliaceae? I know the orchid trade has some specific nomenclatural conventions... Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 02:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

I was on the fence on the quote issue. I think I'll do as you suggest and add the quotes along with a redirect page so that those who don't care about quotes can end up on the same page. Bromels (talk) 04:16, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Sounds like a plan. I don't mean to impose, but since you seem like such a Bromeliaceae expert, would you mind terribly if I sent you a few photos to identify? I've been put in charge of labeling the greenhouse collection at work and I'm stumped on the bromeliads. They're likely common and easy to ID as they're probably from hardware or grocery stores. I know at least in the carnivorous plant trade, there are only a few common cultivars sold in these places. Feel free to decline if you're swamped with other work! Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 03:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

The best place to post pictures for ID is on the GardenWeb.com bromeliad forum. There are some real sharp people who participate on that forum and they enjoy the challenge of the unknown plant. Bromels (talk) 01:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Category:Bromeliaceae genera
Hi. Why did you empty this category? Hesperian 01:47, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks like did, e.g. diff. Rkitko (talk) 02:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Neoregelia 'Dr. Who'
I expanded your stub article for possible inclusion in Did you know. Would you possibly have any additional information on L. Wetzel, who appears to be the originator of this hybrid cultivar specimen? KimChee (talk) 22:39, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Hohenbergia itamarajuensis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hohenbergia itamarajuensis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hohenbergia itamarajuensis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Quasi human  &#124;  Talk  00:00, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello. This is a message letting you know that Tillandsia hubertiana, a page that you either created or have significantly contributed to has been tagged with Multiple Issues. This tag is only used when there are two or more significant problems with the article. If the issues are not corrected within a reasonable time period, the article may be threatened with deletion. Thank you. 50.176.151.150 (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Tillandsia 'Calum' for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tillandsia 'Calum' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tillandsia 'Calum' until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri  TALK  19:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Bromeliaceae species has been nominated for discussion
Category:Bromeliaceae species, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 21:09, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of × Quesmea 'Flame'


The article × Quesmea 'Flame' has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable, and no clear place to redirect it to, given that Quesmea doesn't even exist"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:37, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tillandsia 'Feather Belle'


The article Tillandsia 'Feather Belle' has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable cultivar. Cultivars are not presumed notable in the same manner that natural species are. I was not able to locate any significant (ie non-database/non-trivial) coverage indicating that this particular hybrid cultivar is notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tillandsia 'Bert'


The article Tillandsia 'Bert' has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable cultivar. Cultivars are not presumed notable in the same manner that natural species are. I was not able to locate any significant (ie non-database/non-trivial) coverage indicating that this particular hybrid cultivar is notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

PROD incoming for several cultivars
I've located a large number of apparently non-notable cultivars with no significant coverage and no suitable redirect target. Based on that, I intend to PROD tag a number of them. In the interests of not spamming this talk page with dozens more notices, I'm leaving this note here for documentation. The rationale will all be the same: "Non-notable cultivar. Cultivars are not presumed notable in the same manner that natural species are. I was not able to locate any significant (ie non-database/non-trivial) coverage indicating that this particular hybrid cultivar is notable. It would be UNDUE to list all non-notable cultivars at the genus page, so it's not suitable to be redirected there." A list of the cultivars that I'm working from can be found in this sandbox. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tillandsia 'Feather Duster' for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tillandsia 'Feather Duster' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tillandsia 'Feather Duster' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tillandsia 'Gunalda' for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tillandsia 'Gunalda' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tillandsia 'Gunalda' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Billbergia 'Rosea'


The article Billbergia 'Rosea' has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: '''Per the consensus at WT:PLANTS and the recent AfD Articles for deletion/Tillandsia 'Feather Duster', which closed with a unanimous consensus to delete: # cultivars are not presumed notable the way that scientifically described species are
 * 1) none of these cultivar stubs, sourced solely to a database, have any independent coverage which satisfies WP:GNG.
 * 2) merging to parent species is not possible for hybrids as a page can't be redirected to two pages
 * 3) merging to a genus would fail WP:UNDUE and have the same WP:V issues as the standalone article 4) creating a list to merge to would also have the same WP:V/WP:N issues as a standalone article
 * 4) Thus deletion is the best/only option for undersourced cultivars'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tillandsia 'Pink Panther' for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tillandsia 'Pink Panther' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tillandsia 'Pink Panther' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Billbergia 'Albertii' for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Billbergia 'Albertii' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Billbergia 'Albertii' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neoregelia 'Heck'


The article Neoregelia 'Heck' has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: '''Per the consensus at WT:PLANTS and the recent AfD Articles for deletion/Tillandsia 'Feather Duster', which closed with a unanimous consensus to delete:
 * 1) cultivars are not presumed notable the way that scientifically described species are
 * 2) none of these cultivar stubs, sourced solely to a database, have any independent coverage which satisfies WP:GNG.
 * 3) merging to parent species is not possible for hybrids as a page can't be redirected to two pages
 * 4) merging to a genus would fail WP:UNDUE and have the same WP:V issues as the standalone article
 * 5) creating a list to merge to would also have the same WP:V/WP:N issues as a standalone article
 * 6) Thus deletion is the best/only option for undersourced cultivars'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neoregelia 'Dr. Who'


The article Neoregelia 'Dr. Who' has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: '''Consensus has been established via discussion at WP:PLANTS and previous AfDs/PRODs that individual cultivars are not presumed notable in the same way as natural species, and must meet GNG to have a standalone article. Database and commercial catalog entries are not considered sufficient for this purpose. I found no WP:SIGCOV of this cultivar.

None of the references here contain significant coverage of the cultivar named "Dr Who". The BSI Registry lists it by name and is reliable, but is not in-depth coverage. The rest don't even mention the individual cultivar, but are only used to verify other facts in the article.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bromeliaceae natural hybrid


A tag has been placed on Category:Bromeliaceae natural hybrid indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)