User talk:Brontosh

COM 481
Hi Bronwyn! My name is Adrianna and I am in your COM 481 class. I think we may have taken a class together previously (COM 302), see you in class! Adrifaye (talk) 00:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Hey Bronwyn! Excited to be taking another class with you this quarter Mhdav9 (talk) 05:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Brontosh, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Bronwyn! This is Juliana from your com class. I've peer-reviewed your sandbox draft! It looks great. If you're unable to find my peer review please let me know. See you in class! JulianaRios11 (talk) 03:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Brontosh


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Draft
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Current Version

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hello! The concept of Photo-Referencing is so intriguing, I can't wait to see your final article! Below is my peer-review:

Lead

The lead is concise and to the point, allowing readers to get a grasp on photo-referencing without having to read the entire article. However, given the article isn't broken up into sections yet - there isn't really a brief description of those major points. If you're planning on separating the article into sections, it might be useful to just add a summary of it in the intro!

Content

I don't know much about photo-referencing so I can't confidently speak to whether or not the content included is relevant but it seems like it is! I wonder if there's been any shift in photo referencing with the development of AI in recent times, and how that has impacted this practice if at all. Also I'm curious about the history of photo-referencing (when it became prominent, how has it evolved, notable works, etc.)!

Tone and Balance

The original article seemed balanced and I feel like you contributed to it seamlessly. I couldn't even tell where your contributions began or ended because you perfected neutrality and were able to follow the flow of the article nicely!

Sources and References

The sources and references is where I think the weakest link is here. Given the current version only has two references, of which are cited once, I think there's a lot of room for additional citation that could improve the integrity of this article! Especially in light-box section where you added. bunch of info (though I'm assuming you have your citation in your bibliography sandbox and just haven't moved it over yet).

Organization

I like the current structure of the article! It starts with what photo-referencing is, why it's used, how to use it, and then a real world example. I think breaking the article up into sections might just make it easier to read (i.e., having history section, having the comic book as its own section). As for grammar you just have one type in the lightbox paragraph, second sentence (gined --> gained).

Overall

I think the information you've added about the grid-method technique was really interesting and expands on photo-referencing in a relevant way. My biggest suggestions are just the references and separate sections :) DionnaTaylor (talk) 05:36, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hi Brontosh! I finished your peer review! Great job!

User:Brontosh/Photo-referencing/Studentuw123 Peer Review

Studentuw123 (talk) 03:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)