User talk:Brooke.munro

Third largest?
Hi Brooke, can I just ask you for a source for your "third largest coral reef system" edits to Great Barrier Reef? The United Nations Environment Programme says that it's the "world's most extensive stretch of coral reef", and I've not seen anything yet that says that it's the third largest. Can you please tell me where you've heard of the GBR being the third-largest? Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia! - Malkinann 05:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. FamicomJL 02:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

March 2008
The recent edit you made to Uluru constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 22:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Uluru. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 22:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:M 3be68db7d31cd46d7f9bbe38566f1105.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:M 3be68db7d31cd46d7f9bbe38566f1105.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:L 2735c5219f635cb4505bde3841acbb24.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:L 2735c5219f635cb4505bde3841acbb24.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Mystery of Natalie Wood
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 08:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to St. Philip's Christian College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Prince of Canadat 07:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)