User talk:BrooklynBrendan

The Visions of Tondal
Normally you shouldn't remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created yourself. But I do thank you for your excellent cleanup and your unique content. Cheers! &mdash; madman bum and angel 04:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense of Paddywhackery
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Paddywhackery, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Paddywhackery provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Paddywhackery, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 05:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Paddywhackery. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. E_dog95'  Hi ' 05:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)