User talk:Brooklynbarnes

September 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gina Carano has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gina Carano was changed by Brooklynbarnes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909359 on 2020-09-13T09:00:04+00:00

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Gina Carano. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

  Caius G. (talk) 09:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)