User talk:Brooklynch

To fellow editors: Please refrain from citing things that don't havea reference or source. Especially if you are writing allegations against a religion or Group. When your unsourced material is removed - please don't keep on putting it back. Brooklynch (talk) 20:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

(Sarcastic) suggestions for articles
I think if you've got the sources for something, there's no reason not to create an article on it. Wikipedia isn't a single creator god that makes some articles come into being and makes others stay nonexistent forever; articles are created through the efforts of individual users who have topics they are interested in (like me and opera, abortion politics in the U.S., or Israeli and Yiddish works and authors that people should know) or who come across information they realize Wikipedia doesn't have. So if sexual abuse is a systemic problem in the L.A. schools, Wikipedia doesn't cover it, and you think the sources support its existence as a topic instead of a couple of individual incidents (which I'm not getting from what you posted, but maybe you have more), it's not that Wikipedia has decided it shouldn't exist, and you could go for it. I also don't think the sources you posted illustrate anything in particular about the black community's response to rape or single that community out, but if you were interested in writing anything about how communities in general respond to such incidents (this would probably entail expanding an existing article, like victim blaming or rape culture), because responses to the Steubenville rape case and the suicide of Rehtaeh Parsons, among others, were quite similar without a race element, we could totally work together on that. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello
This message is to let you know that I have made some changes to Sexual abuse cases in Brooklyn's Haredi community which address concerns you may have raised in the deletion discussion. Please view the revised article and the talk page, and consider changing your vote. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Meyer Seewald for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meyer Seewald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meyer Seewald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 06:57, 4 November 2014 (UTC)