User talk:Brooklynguy7

October 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Gilad Segev has been reverted. Your edit here to Gilad Segev was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsQN26NxEPA, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aNcgd3bYSI&list=PLH4VeaiVk0410eW5iC0LHH8WZe6RjAdqK) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Brooklynguy7, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Gilad Segev have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Gilad Segev was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GUu4TmD4dM) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:19, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Gilad Segev, you may be blocked from editing. Not just improperly sourced (YouTube doesn't count), but also blatantly promotional... Drmies (talk) 17:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Drmies, I would like to extend my sincere apology for this mistake. I did not realize that I was not able to cite YouTube videos. Thank you for pointing that out to me. I will do my best to be more aware of this (and other policies) going forward. I assure you I am not trying to contribute to disruptive editing at all whatsoever, so I appreciate you bringing that to my attention.


 * My sincere apologies. I am learning and I really appreciate you flagging these issues to me. It helps me become a better editor. I am not trying to contribute to disruptive editing at all whatsoever. I hope you understand. Brooklynguy7 (talk) 20:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

 * Cheers! Thank you, again, for your insight and help today! Brooklynguy7 (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)