User talk:Broomtherapper

Reply
First of all, sources are needed, to list King T, and everyone else without a source is vandalism. Second, 50 himself is not a reliable source. If we believe him, yet Game makes a video saying he isn't signed, then we wouldn't know what to do, that's why we use reliable sources. All "rap basement" did was repeat and show the video of what 50 said. That's not reliable. And I've never stated that Slaughterhosue or anyone else was signed. Please take your issues to the article talk pages, I can respond there, also, if/when other editors discuss, it will be easier to find all aspects of discussion. --HELLØ   ŦHERE 21:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * As I said, I understand about the 50/Game thing. I'm not saying 50 was wrong, nor am I saying that Game did say anything contrary, but for our standards at Wikipedia, we need more than "he said ____". And in that case, being dropped from Aftermath would not be the same, as Banks and Yayo are both off Interscope, but not G-Unit Records. Two final notes, you don't need to start a new section on someone's talk page for further discussion, and if there's anything I can do to help, just let me know. --HELLØ    ŦHERE 21:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Firstly, "DaShadySpot" isn't a reliable source. Secondly, it isn't anything new, it's just Relapse with some extra tracks. It has a mention on that page, and doesn't deserve its own article by far. Good looking out though. --HELLØ    ŦHERE 16:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I have taken it to the hip ho WikiProject, please wait until there has been some consensus (also seeing as the "Aftermath" website is a primary source). Wikipedia isn't going anywhere. If a consensus is drawn, it can be changed, until then, please follow the rules of third party sources, not just claims from 50 himself. --HELLØ    ŦHERE 19:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It won't go to waste, I'm going to add a sentence (or two) which states the situation from both sides and ends with something like "but there has been no further confirmation" or something like that. --HELLØ    ŦHERE 20:00, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Firstly, I never stated the Aftermath site was a reliable source. I did admit I was wrong, but not that the Aftermath source was correct. And even if it were (which it isn't per guidelines) MTV is more reliable anyway. --HELLØ   ŦHERE 16:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The Aftermath site is a blog, and not a third party source, which it must be per the rules of wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't going anywhere; if what you've put is true, please find a more reliable source. --HELLØ    ŦHERE 16:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Very first sentence from WP:V:

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true. --HELLØ   ŦHERE 16:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Mobb Deep
Hi, first of all. The image itself does not have any copyright information and therefore it's status on whether it can be used on Wikipedia or not is unknown. Please read COPYRIGHT for more information. The image itself has not been deleted. If you can provide any status on it's copyright or whether or not it can be used on Wikipedia, please do so. Taylor Karras (talk) 02:16, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Mopgunit.png
Thanks for uploading File:Mopgunit.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Gggggggk.png
Thanks for uploading File:Gggggggk.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hayes222.png
Thanks for uploading File:Hayes222.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Cashis34.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cashis34.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Bishop Lamont222.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Lamont222.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:50cent333.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:50cent333.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:20090316-slghtr-450x251.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:20090316-slghtr-450x251.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Slim.png
Thanks for uploading File:Slim.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 15:46, 12 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Hayes222.png
Thank you for uploading File:Hayes222.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:28, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Mazaradi111.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mazaradi111.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Mazaradi111.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mazaradi111.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:MarshaA.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MarshaA.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

MTV.
Hello, I wanted to once again point you to the reliable sources page as it seems, from your edits, that you're just finding any "published" source and claiming it to be reliable which is not the same thing. Also, in response to your claim that the "Aftermath" blog is reliable because MTV, a blog, is reliable, there is a specific section covered right on the reliable sources page which I hope clears things up. Not everything on Wikipedia deserves an entry, and Wikipedia isn't going away, so it won't hurt to wait and find reliable sources for notable things (which not everything is). I'm sorry we seem to be having disagreements, but certain things (if not all) must comply to the policies, which several of your edits don't seem to do. I am not trying to chastise or yell at you, I am simply pointing out certain faults so that the community at large can be helped, which, afterall, is the point of Wikipedia. Thank you. --HELLØ   ŦHERE 19:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

I just posted something on your talk page un aware that you have sent me this. Take the time to read that, then read this again.

With all of what you said about Aftermath Ent Blog above, You have used the site for many citation yourself, including the leaving of G.A.G.E, and Focus...

I mean, it's kinda like we're pulling teeth here. I realize that Wikipedia has a set standard of rules, but are they including a common sense factor within it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Broomtherapper (talk • contribs)
 * If I have used it before, I'm sorry, I'll remove it myself. Also, I am not the person to question on the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. If you search around, you can find numerous councils to take your argument to. But right now, per policy, many of the sources you have used are considered unreliable. --HELLØ    ŦHERE 19:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Affiliated.
The affiliated labels should not be there in the first place. It is pointless fancruft. The subsidiary labels should also not be noted on these pages but on the list page of Universal Music Group, as they have been in the past. If we are going to list ever single affiliate label, then we should list Timbaland's label, and Death Row, And ruthless, etc. They're all "affiliated" y definition. The list will get too long, and it's overall unneeded. Please take to the article talk pages before making such major changes. There is no precedent on Wikipedia for things like that. It should not be included. --HELLØ   ŦHERE 19:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Understood. I think that some people put Links to Shady/Aftermath/G-Unit because they know that they're closely knit, and that people are going to want to navigate from page to page quickly. I understand your disposition on this and will revert from editing it, but just make sure that people don't re-add the affiliated labels for I have seen them numerous of occasions at the bottom of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Broomtherapper (talk • contribs)
 * I admit, I myself have edited, removed, and re-added them on the several pages. We're all learning on Wikipedia, and helping others to learn. I hope that in the future, we can work together more civilly, to help build Wikipedia. (With reliable sources of course. :P) --HELLØ    ŦHERE 19:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dream Big Ventures


The article Dream Big Ventures has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This record label has yet to release any music; no reliable sources to bolster any notability claimed; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Accounting4Taste: talk 20:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Hayes (rapper)
I have nominated Hayes (rapper), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Hayes (rapper). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Hayes (rapper)
I have nominated Hayes (rapper), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Hayes (rapper). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mazaradi Fox (rapper)
I have nominated Mazaradi Fox (rapper), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mazaradi Fox (rapper). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Slim da Mobster
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Slim da Mobster. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Slim da Mobster. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

New Year New Job.
Welcome back Broom. Good job with the latest edits. I'm glad to see you're back helping out Wikipedia. Also I'm glad that things seem to be going well. Our next project will have to be how to format refs. Ha ha. No, but seriously, good work, welcome back, and happy editing. --HELLØ   ŦHERE 19:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Happy New Year to you too. I probably need some help with the citations. I keep on using:


 * Yeah, if you want to use the basic form, instead of "title of article ['link']" use "['link' title of article]". Understand? So it would look like . It's a little difficult to get used to, but it works. Awesome job with the G-Unit page by the way. I hope you don't mind that I touched it up a bit. --HELLØ    ŦHERE 20:40, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Response.
Broom, hey, thanks for sending me the info, but currently, I don't have Internet at home. Not sure when I'll have it full time either. I can try but it's a rarity anymore if I can even check my e-mail. Ha ha. --HELLØ   ŦHERE 20:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Buddy45.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Buddy45.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:47, 12 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 23:47, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Swine flu.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Swine flu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Krazy_game.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Krazy_game.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 19:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Sandbox
Your user page has been moved to User:Broomtherapper/sandbox; please continue your edits on the draft there. Skier Dude ( talk  02:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Dates.
I'm not trying to "do" anything except follow the rules, which clearly state:

The record label or labels to which the act has been signed, as a comma-separated list. Omit parenthetical dates; save that information for the main article. Drop the word "Records" from the end of any label's name (e.g. use Universal rather than Universal Records.) Separate multiple entries with.

Why not just put it in the article? It looks like it needs to be expanded anyway. --HELLØ   ŦHERE 19:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Youngbuckrehab.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Youngbuckrehab.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Red Flag on  the Right Side  05:12, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  Red Flag on  the Right Side  04:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I've moved The Rehab (album) to The Rehab (mixtape) for you. :)  ʄ lame   00:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:50 Cent The Invitation2 .jpg
Thanks for uploading File:50 Cent The Invitation2 .jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Jayandeminem.png
Thank you for uploading File:Jayandeminem.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. dave pape (talk) 23:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Eminemoxegen.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Eminemoxegen.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 Hours for Personal attacks or harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:04, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigger Than Life (album)
Please don't modify closed deletion discussions, like you did with this. If you think the close was inappropriate, then nominate if for review at WP:DRV or contact the closing admin for a copy in your userspace. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  01:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tony Yayo's Second Studio Album


The article Tony Yayo's Second Studio Album has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  03:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of N.W.A. (New World Agenda)


The article N.W.A. (New World Agenda) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  03:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of N.W.A. (New World Agenda) for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article N.W.A. (New World Agenda), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/N.W.A. (New World Agenda) until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  05:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with N.W.A. (New World Agenda). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  12:49, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Tony Yayo's Second Studio Album. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  12:49, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Careless World
Initially, I noted that the article has not been appropriately tagged for deletion. Then I noticed that the discussion was added to another article's deletion discussion and removed it from there. Please familiarise yourself with the steps of the deletion process. --78.34.202.185 (talk) 09:07, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Trackstar (Start it up)
whats going on this is cardiak (The real cardiak) can u please stop changing the credits saying kanye produced my track... because he didnt. im telling u i made that beat. banks never said kanye produced the record. he said the kanye joint (as refering to the joint he is featured on) check the net and especially twitter... i produced the record Cardiak

here is lloyd banks twitter page http://twitter.com/lloydbanks he just shouted me out (Cardiakflatline) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cardiak100 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

and listen to fabs verse my flatline is in the middle of his verse —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cardiak100 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

"wikipedia policy inforcers [sic]"
Could you kindly tell me where you checked that rapbasement.com was a reliable source, please? Thank you. Yves (talk) 00:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

"Wikipedia policy inforcers"
Which Wikipedia policy inforcer did you take your edits to Loud (Rihanna album) up with? When?&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

I do not have a url to it, but you need to discuss it with one of them before reverting it.

It happened last year on Eminem's Relapse album.
 * That's WP:OTHERSTUFF. You are being quite vague with your explanation. I doubt they would allow a fan site to be used as a reliable source. Yves (talk) 01:05, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Young hot rod.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Young hot rod.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:07, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Lofdftyson.png
Thanks for uploading File:Lofdftyson.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Lofdftyson.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lofdftyson.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:30, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Fifty and governor.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fifty and governor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Em and jay.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Em and jay.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:10, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Em and jay.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Em and jay.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:10, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Governorwashington2.png
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Governorwashington2.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CrKtKNr8o0. As a copyright violation, File:Governorwashington2.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Governorwashington2.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Governorwashington2.png and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Governorwashington2.png with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Governorwashington2.png.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:10, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Underrated album cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Underrated album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:40, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Covert Coup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to The Alchemist


 * Russian Roulette (The Alchemist album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to The Alchemist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:FIVE (50 CENT ALBUM) COVER.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FIVE (50 CENT ALBUM) COVER.jpg, which you've sourced to twitter.com/50cent. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Russian Roulette (Alchemist album).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Russian Roulette (Alchemist album).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:25, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:G-Unit Philly.png


The file File:G-Unit Philly.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MGA73 (talk) 20:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Survivor south pacific logo.jpeg


The file File:Survivor south pacific logo.jpeg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "replaced by File:Survivor south pacific twenty-third season region 1 dvd.png as lead image of Survivor: South Pacific...."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor south pacific logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Survivor south pacific logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)