User talk:Broookss

October 2017
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to CFS, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. sciencewatcher (talk) 23:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chronic fatigue syndrome, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''While some of your edits were very constructive, the majority of content added was unsourced and shifted the article away from WP:NPOV which is, at times, indicative of a conflict of interests. '' Operator873 CONNECT 20:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

That text was in the article based on consensus
here If you continue to remove it you may lose your ability to edit. Please read WP:3RR Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 16:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Canvassing
It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages (or off-site) to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. --sciencewatcher (talk) 20:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * sciencewatcher, do you have any evidence of canvassing? Feel free to email me if it's sensitive. Clayoquot
 * See here (you can see it was posted by Broookss as she admits she made edits that Broookss made). --sciencewatcher (talk) 22:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

(talk | contribs) 20:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Thanks. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 05:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


 * You also need to sign your talk page contributions. And please read and follow WP:COI Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 06:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

When you make a comment on a Talk page, please add your signature by typing four ~ symbols in a row. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 20:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)