User talk:Brose13

Little context in Kelsi Nielsen
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kelsi Nielsen, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kelsi Nielsen is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kelsi Nielsen, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Kelsi Nielsen itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. IrishGuy talk 23:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Can I help?
I see you're having trouble getting Stories from East High: Book Series started. I see, also, that you're new, and may not be familiar with the guidelines. The guideline that's a problem with this article is the notability guideline. Every article on Wikipedia has to include information and sources showing how the subject is important. It isn't enough for a book simply to be published, it has to be significant in some way. It would help a lot if you had some independent sources- book reviews, magazine articles, that sort of thing- to show that this is an important series of books. You might find it useful to look at our article on A Series of Unfortunate Events to see an example of an article that shows how the book series is significant and uses independent sources to verify its information. -FisherQueen (Talk) 23:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Real Love (1985).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Real Love (1985).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Freida Parton
A tag has been placed on Freida Parton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 20:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Diary of the differant
A tag has been placed on Diary of the differant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 01:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 03:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Kiely Williams.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kiely Williams.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Q T C 13:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Adrienne.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adrienne.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Q T C 13:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Raven-Symone.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Raven-Symone.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Q T C 13:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Nomoredrama2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nomoredrama2.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Repost of Interpersonal (Ali Lohan album)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Interpersonal (Ali Lohan album), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Interpersonal (Ali Lohan album) was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Interpersonal (Ali Lohan album), please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. -MBK004 00:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ali Lohan.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ali Lohan.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk ) 20:47, 10 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm in favour of second chances. Would you care to explain a little about your new understanding of copyright and notability? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:31, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * In general, everything needs to have a cited source that correlates to the source listing at the bottom of the page. It has to be a reliable source, and multiple would be preferable.  In specifics to Wikipedia, especially when it comes to music releases, not every release (such as budget albums or promo singles) are notable enough to have an entire page dedicated to it.  Probably the most important thing I can say, given my history above, is this: Just because I Google search and save an image, upload it but give the link I got it from, does not mean its free or that I have followed every step to make it acceptable for Wikipedia.  I have no permission and no right to post someone else's legally copyrighted work.


 * Generally speaking, I am very well disposed to considering unblocking in circumstance like this. In four years people can change a lot, and I have often given people another chance in similar circumstances. However, I notice that both your unblock request and your reply to BWilkins refer only to "copyright and sourcing", but the block log says that you were blocked for vandalism, and indeed I have found some vandalism in your editing history. Can you comment on that? JamesBWatson (talk) 11:07, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, here maybe is a good time to ask for clarification. I do not believe I vandalised at all.  Could you tell me what was interpreted as vandalism?

Orphaned non-free image File:Nomoredrama2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Nomoredrama2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of the Bands (book)


The article Battle of the Bands (book) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NBOOK. Not able to find any sources or reviews for it."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:44, 23 February 2019 (UTC)