User talk:Brothers of Bear

February 2021
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ GB fan 19:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

I apologise.
GB fan, I temporarily went insane. obviously that is frowned upon, and I will keep an eye on that in future. than kyou for pointing that out.

Sockpuppet investigation
EN - Jungwon  09:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Connections?
What are your connections to Users Houston,illinois, TicTawCentral, Waussus, WaussusBeaver, Oatsandcream and IP 174.3.212.76? Asking because there are strong overlaps for articles being drafted. Example: Barraclough Series. David notMD (talk) 20:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Barraclough Brothers


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:The Barraclough Brothers. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts, and persistent unconstructive editing of various kinds. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.