User talk:Browsercookies

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Piccadilly Pub. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Piccadilly_Pub&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Klilidiplomus+Talk 15:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Piccadilly Pub with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. mmovchin Talk 15:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Piccadilly Pub with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. mmovchin Talk 15:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:48, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Note that we require sources to document the statements in articles, and the statements you repeatedly removed have sources attached to them. If you believe they are inaccurate, you need to either a) produce sources that contradict what is in the article, or b) show why the sources used are not valid (not reliable, don't actually say what the article says they say, etc). Repeatedly removing content without explanation is edit warring, and you have been blocked as a result. Please do be careful. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:37, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * On review, I've increased the block to an indefinite one; nearly every single edit has been a violation of our policies - many including removal of sourced content, edit-warring, and the like. If you wish to be unblocked, you'll want to go review our Guide to appealing blocks and explain how you intend to edit within the bounds of our policies. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:48, 13 February 2012 (UTC)