User talk:Bruce526

I'm Austin. Welcome to my page.

Bruce526 (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, this is Joel. I hope I'm doing this right. JoelCollins15 (talk) 09:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

article choices
It looks like you've got almost a blank slate for improving any of the articles, so going with whatever you can find the best sources for indeed sounds like good advice. The physics and psychology have a bit higher traffic, but the biographies will be easier to organize and you can get either of them into a much-improved state pretty easily if you have some solid sources.--ragesoss (talk) 15:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * One more thing: both the physics and psychology articles have interesting histories. (Check out the talk pages for some details.) They used to be much, much longer, but they were basically cut down to almost nothing because the editor who had built them was banned because of "abuse of sources". So if you choose either of them, you may want to check out the old versions and see if anything is worth using... but if you do, be absolutely sure that you verify the content against the cited sources (that is, make sure the sources actually say what they used to back up), and remove anything that you can't verify yourself from the sources.--ragesoss (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

refs
Hi! I see that you've gotten started in your sandbox with the psychology article, with a nice list of sources at the end. I encourage you to create inline citations as you go, so you can keep track of which information comes from which source. Try the "Cite" button in the edit to create nicely formatted citations (see this if you want some instructions on using it). Good luck, and if you've got any questions let me know.--ragesoss (talk) 18:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Lookin' Good
You have really expanded and redone this article to include lots of information in a non bias fashion. Good job! Kevinolson1 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)