User talk:Bruce Dangerfield

1/1 The student has improved the quality of the information available in this article 1/1 The student has improved the clarity and/or organization of the content .5/1 The student has clearly explained the method and findings of an empirical paper 1/1 The student has correctly cited the empirical paper according to Wikipedia guidelines, and the paper is appropriate (i.e., it is an empirical study on development published the results in an academic journal) Comments and Suggestions for Improvement: Overall your improvements were very well done, good job! My only suggestions to you would be to explain your empirical article a little further, just by giving a brief overview of who was involved, such as the particular group of participants in the study, the methods used and the researchers. But overall well done :) Achaney123 (talk) 16:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)