User talk:Brucesmith-usa

May 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Printed circuit board. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

I am making the reasonable assumption (since you have made an identical edit) that you are the same person who anonymously edited the article and was warned here.  Spinning Spark  15:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Brucesmith-usa, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at List of EDA companies, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Blogs are not an acceptable external link, and as for your practice of hiding redlinks by piping to a legitimate article, that is deceptive in the extreme.  Spinning Spark  19:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. ''I have just deleted your userpage for unambiguous advertising. While we are quite tolerant of what user's have on their own userpage, advertising is definitely not permitted. This really is your final warning now. If you try to promote your company on Wikipedia again, no matter in how minor or trivial a way, you will be blocked from editing.''  Spinning Spark  09:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Spinning Spark  10:54, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

.

I blocked you for using your account only for promotion. In his unblock decline message Anthony Bradbury asked you what you do intend to write about if unblocked. You have not replied to him.  Spinning Spark  08:28, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keeping all of the above in mind, please answer Anthony Bradbury's early question - if unblocked, what do you intend to edit? Yunshui 雲 水 10:24, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I will write about my personal interest, achievement, qualification and will participate to offer some healthy information without advertising. Brucesmith-usa (talk) 12:43, 21 May 2014 (UTC)}
 * Above answer extracted from unnecessary new request. Only one request at a time, please, and you don't need to post a request to answer a question. Peridon (talk) 13:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * No you won't. Wikipedia is not free web-hosting for your CV. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 14:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user= autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 15:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)