User talk:Brucewayneent

Welcome!

Hello, Brucewayneent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Carmine Sciandra. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 18:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Carmine Sciandra
Your addition to Carmine Sciandra added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thanks, ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 18:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Bruno crime family
Please don't cut and past articles to move them to a new title.

From Wikipedia:Moving a page :

''You should never just move a page by cutting all the text out of one page, and pasting it into a new one; old revisions, notes, and attributions are much harder to keep track of if you do that. (But you may have to if, for instance, you're splitting a page into multiple topics. If you do, please include a note in the new page's edit summary and talk page stating where you took the text from.)''

Please see Requested moves, if you'd like a page moved. Thanks. --Ted87 (talk) 18:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Bruno crime family. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you.--Ted87 (talk) 22:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Giovanni Riggi
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Giovanni Riggi, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.myspace.com/thestrangecompany/blog/347040927. As a copyright violation, Giovanni Riggi appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Giovanni Riggi has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Giovanni Riggi and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Giovanni Riggi with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Giovanni Riggi.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dpmuk (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Anthony Stabile
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Anthony Stabile, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://wiki.thesopranos.com/Anthony_Stabile.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Gambino family Boss

 * Salvatore D'Aquila was his own boss operating in East Harlem and South Bronx he later moved into Brooklyn around 1910s. In 1916, he took over some of the Camorra gangs making the largest crime family in New York City.
 * Pellegrino Morano was the boss of the Brooklyn Camorra family, which after 1916 was no longer active. The Camorra gang members went into other crime familys (like the D'Aquila family or the Masseria family). From 1916 on the Italian Mafia was controlled by the Sicilian Mafia. --Vic49 (talk)  14:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicholas Furina


A tag has been placed on Nicholas Furina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Quiggers1P (talk) 15:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ralph Esposito


The article Ralph Esposito has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I have two concerns about this article - the first is that I could only find articles on him from the WCNYH, so he may not pass WP:N. The other is that as far as I can see he is not proven to be a soldato as per the source, which could be a libel issue.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 16:22, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Messages
Hi there, I've left a message for you at my user talk, and also another one at Talk:Ralph Esposito if you want to have a look. Thanks. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 16:57, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Brucewayneent/GOTTI: In The Shadow Of My Father has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GOTTI: In The Shadow Of My Father, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. Petan-Bot (talk) 17:09, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! - Happysailor  (Talk) 17:34, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Brooklyn Camorra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article  Brooklyn Camorra  is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brooklyn Camorra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Brooklyn Camorra does not exist, typical case of WP:NOR - DonCalo (talk) 10:03, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Joseph Ida
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Joseph Ida, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.lacndb.com/php/Info.php?name=Joseph%20Ida.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 00:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Ida


A tag has been placed on Joseph Ida requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cbrittain10 (talk&#124;contribs) 01:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Ralph Esposito (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Union and Waterfront


 * Genovese crime family New Jersey faction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Waterfront

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Joseph Massimino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Charges, Conspiracy and Assault and battery


 * Ron Previte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Christening

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Your addition to Newfoundland (island) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 13:22, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to Joseph Massimino has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copyvio removed Dougweller (talk) 13:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to Ron Previte has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 13:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 13:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Note that you can be unblocked if you:
 * Can show convincing evidence that you understand why you were blocked and that you will refrain from copyvio in the future.
 * Insure that your edits are cited properly - looking at your articles you seem to be adding citations randomly so that the source is actually for another part of the article.
 * Agree to help clean up your articles. Dougweller (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Please note I won't deal with unblock requests via email. You've had numerous warnings in the past and have ignored them. Please read Copy-paste - minor changes in wording are not sufficient, your text must not look similar to the original. And the problems with your article creation goes beyond copyright issues, see . I now think that to be unblocked besides showing that you can work within our policy on copyright, you need to show you understand our policy at WP:BLP and our notability criteria at WP:PEOPLE. When you think you can do this, follow the procedure in the block notice above, please don't email me. Dougweller (talk) 12:56, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dominick Olivetto


The article Dominick Olivetto has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no reliable sources to support original claim which was a WP:BLP violation]]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  23:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of John Bokun for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Bokun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Bokun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 10:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Ralph Esposito for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Esposito is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ralph Esposito until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 11:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steve Mazzone


The article Steve Mazzone has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. &#32; The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * unsouced content about a living person

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Steve Mazzone


A tag has been placed on Steve Mazzone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Patchy1   09:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GOTTI: In The Shadow Of My Father concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GOTTI: In The Shadow Of My Father, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission GOTTI: In The Shadow Of My Father


Hello Brucewayneent. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled GOTTI: In The Shadow Of My Father.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Gregory Goffredo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregory Goffredo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gregory Goffredo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 08:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)