User talk:Brunk500

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Anna Lincoln  08:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Another look
The nom really was required by wp:before to do a google search first; and I think it's generally good form for AfD voters to do the same before opining. While an article may be lacking, if there are sources out there (though not reflected in the article), it is not a proper candidate for deletion. In any even, I've added a smattering of sources, so in the event you are not watching the AfD page, I thought I would let you know -- you may want to take another look at the article, and perhaps consider your vote. See Articles for deletion/Punchball. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
 Anna Lincoln  08:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Importance
Article importance is subjective, but I am certain that ScreenWest is neither mid nor high for the Australian and WA projects. Those grades are kept for truly notable topics such as important landmarks or bios of very influential people (eg Premiers, Kings Park). The table at the top of Category:High-importance Western Australia articles and the articles categorised as such will give an idea. To be honest, the ScreenWest article as it now stands, is only marginally notable per WP standards. I have reverted the ratings. Sing out if you need a hand. –Moondyne 12:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I just discovered WikiProject Films/Australian cinema task force which might interest you. –Moondyne 12:05, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

A (smallish) funding bureacracy more important than a premier? Hmmm. Within the arts arena, funding is important I'm sure, but in the context of an encyclopaedia, I think not. Anyway, this matter is so trivial I won't revert you again but do ask you to consider what I've said and that perhaps I know what I'm talking about in respect of an article's place in the Wikipedia notability hierarchy. I've been doing this for 6 years, and you been here for 3 weeks. Your contributions are appreciated and I hope you hang around. –Moondyne 13:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Purely for the sake of discussion, why would you say a Screenwest is more important than the Cygnet? One has been here for only a relatively short time (the website indicates 10 or so years); there's no secondary sources available to say why its important—only its own website; its function seems to be to receive funding from Lotteries West & consolidated revenue and hand that on to film-makers.  The other is an iconic heritage listed art-deco theatre.  It has provided an entertainment venue to countless thousands of people for over 70 years.  As well as the state list it is on the Register of the National Estate.  It is vitally important to the whole state both culturally and architecturally and is an important part of Como/S.Perth's social history.  The article has a dozen or so secondary sources supporting that.


 * I consider myself fairly well-informed but confess I've never heard of ScreenWest until this evening. My wife and I also go to the cinema occasionally.  Clearly it is important to those who make films but to the other 99.9% of the population it isn't.  I think that your comparison is biased because of where you sit, and that the average reader of this encyclopaedia would have a very different perspective and idea of what's important.  My question above is slightly rhetorical, but perhaps I am missing something. –Moondyne 15:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfounded WP:ABF struck out. My apologies.  –Moondyne 15:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ZODIAC MOTHERFUCKER
A tag has been placed on ZODIAC MOTHERFUCKER requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 09:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as ZODIAC MOTHERFUCKER, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Eeekster (talk) 09:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Eeekster ‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:03, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Per your request, now in your userspace at User:Brunk500/ZODIAC MOTHERFUCKER. I looked at the article again, and didn't see any reliable sources per WP:V that show this anonymous person's notability.  Blogs aren't reliable sources.  NawlinWiki (talk) 14:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I've reviewed your draft -article again. The only sources *independent of the AV Club* that mention ZMF are two blogs (your sources 8 and 9).  Therefore, there aren't reliable, independent sources to establish ZMF's notability.  If you can find a reference to ZMF in a reliable independent source, let me know.  NawlinWiki (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)


 * "Articles should be based upon reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." The AV Club is not a **third-party** source (i.e., not independent) with respect to itself or its own contributors.  NawlinWiki (talk) 18:05, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

I have no idea how this happened- im not using a shared computer. --Brunk500 (talk) 03:59, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You do have a highly dynamic IP address, though, and there are a lot of users (at least one naughty) coming through on your range. --jpgordon:==( o ) 04:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

:-)

 * ;-)  Anna Lincoln  09:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Next drive
As you are either a participant of WikiProject or the October wikification drive or have signed up to participate in the planned December drive, this probably concerns you. Discussions that have been inactive for a couple weeks regarding the December drive have been reactivated, and we would like you to participate in these discussions, and also consider joining the December drive. We have taken upon ourselves a massive workload, encompassing a backlog reaching June 2008 and comprising articles. Barnstars will be awarded to participating editors, and also, please invite your friends to join! Please do not reply to this message here. Either reply here, here or here.

For the December Drive Coordinators,.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 23:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC).

Invitation to particpate in the December 2010 Wikification Drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 18:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC).

Please confirm your membership
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:21, 22 December 2010 (UTC).

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

List of YouTubers
There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 05:26, 30 April 2018 (UTC)