User talk:Bruno Rene Vargas/Archives/2021/March

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of produced films included in The Black List, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Untitled Universal Live Action Project draft
Seriously? This film could literally be describing any Universal Pictures movie. Outside of it being allocated a tax credit, there is no individual information about the project itself. Who’s directing? Who’s producing? When did it first start development? I want you to tell me why this was a necessary draft to make. Rusted AutoParts 14:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * you say you don't look at my edit history but then you come to criticize my drafts, please instead of following up on my edits spend that time doing other things. This will be the last answer you will receive from me so any other answer from you will no longer be answered because I consider it a waste of time. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I was looking for another Untited project in the draftspace when it came up, I’m not following your edits. I’d still like it explained why this draft isn’t a redundancy and shouldn’t be put up for deletion. Rusted AutoParts  16:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Swarm film poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Swarm film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

The Legitimate Wise Guy
Hi Bruno,

I want to let you know that I created Draft:The Legitimate Wiseguy on February 26th without realizing you started work on Draft:The Legitimate Wise Guy on February 19th. I've redirected my draft to yours. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for doing it, it was very nice of you. I was going to request the merge of histories but from what I just saw your draft is very small and that is why I think it is better to just redirect it. Greetings. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 20:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Limbo (2021 film)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Limbo (2021 film). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Limbo (upcoming Hong Kong film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Limbo (upcoming Hong Kong film). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BOVINEBOY 2008 11:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Lion King draft
2 things: like I said in my edit summary, it already exists at Draft:Untitled The Lion King prequel. It does not yet have a title, it’s inappropriate to call it Lion King 2. Second I noticed you just copy and pasted the production section from another page. Please don’t do that, reword it if necessary. Rusted AutoParts 15:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 2 things too: In the first place, I was unaware of the existence of that other draft, so now I have transferred the content to that draft without any problem. Secondly, you will see that it clarifies that it is a copy-paste from The Lion King (2019 film), which is allowed as long as it is clarified in the editing summary or on the talk page. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 15:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

this was not criticism this was stating the situation. Thank you for filling out the correct template. Rusted AutoParts 15:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Cocaine Bear
Hello Bruno Rene Vargas, I have reverted/removed the template from Draft:Cocaine Bear because no "attribution needs to be preserved" because the other draft had no content about the film to begin with. Merging the drafts would not be beneficial for the articles history unless you want to claim "article creator" for adding no content to the article. Thanks, Vistadan 12:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Well, I will not argue with you, I will directly show you an example of how to proceed when you see another user already created a draft before you. Here you can see how without any problem I deleted the content of my draft and redirected it to this one when I realized that there was already another one created previously. You would have done the same and you avoid these types of conflicts. In addition, I always expand my drafts before publishing them, so your accusation has no basis whatsoever. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 13:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Reply
They were at the target location. There’s no other Cocaine Bear articles so why should they move theirs to yours? I saw you already tried to have the two merged but was rejected so what I was seeing was an editor trying to circumvent that and render another editors hard work wasted by retroactively making yours better. That’s not fair to the editor. As evidenced by our interaction over Lady in the Lake today, it’s an example that not every editor is vetting whether a draft already exists. Regardless why should that editor rubbish their version when your previous one just looked like this?

You have countless other drafts anyway, let this one go. Rusted AutoParts 20:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Variety Insight
Hi, sorry to bother you. I was going to create Draft:Wild Cards (TV series) earlier but noticed that you had already created it and when reading through it I noticed you cited something from Variety Insight. I use Variety Insight lots without a subscription for filming updates, but I can't seem to find the part of the website which displays projects in development. In development projects aren't listed in the list of films and series featured as part of their Production Restart chart and I can't seem to find them anywhere else without the website leading me to get a subscription... but the links you used seem to indicate that the in development projects like Wild Cards are part of Production Restart, which is kind of strange since in development projects haven't been confirmed to be moving forward yet. I don't know if you are a subscriber to Variety Insight yourself but do you possibly have a link to Variety Insight's list of projects that are in active development as part of Production Restart that I could access without a subscription? (if it even exists) If so that would be very helpful to me. Regards, A PD   (hmu) 20:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Archiving talk page comments
Hello, Bruno,

Please do not archive your talk page comments so quickly. Leave at least a few days or weeks worth of comments. I was looking into the Cocaine Bear draft situation and my page moves would have not been necessary if I had seen today's comments on your user talk page. I didn't think to go into your talk page archives to see a comment left for you today. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Simone Veil, A Woman of the Century moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Simone Veil, A Woman of the Century, is not suitable as written to remain published per WP:NFO (NFF is only part of the notability guideline). It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage of the production. While Variety is a great source for articles, the Variety Insight information does not contain any actual reporting; it is more of a directory/database list of facts. (?) It seems like it might bee a good tool to verifiy claims, but Verifiability and Notability are separate requirements. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 2pou (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Struggle Alley


The article Struggle Alley has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, nothing found to help it pass WP:NFILM or WP:NFF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

American Boogeywoman moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, American Boogeywoman, is not suitable as written to remain published. This is an unreleased film, and does not satisfy film notability guidelines. It should be restored to article space with reception information after the film is released. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of American Boogeywoman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Boogeywoman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/American Boogeywoman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Question
I have to ask this, as it's been perplexing me these past few days, why did you thank my edits on the page mover request? It wasn't exactly favorable towards yourself. Rusted AutoParts 23:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I did it ironically since it bothered me that you intervened there without anyone calling you. And also for what purpose do you bring that here almost two weeks later? Do you want to start conflicts with me again? Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 23:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ...I literally said above "as it's been perplexing me these past few days". That's all. Rusted AutoParts  23:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Ashley Greene
Next time, please actually add your source as an inline citation. Not doing so here was either inexcusable laziness, or some kind of unnecessary WP:POINT-y type editing. Either way, don't do that again. And from now on, expect you will get WP:BURDEN challenges on edits like this, esp. on future projects which fall under WP:CRYSTAL. so just go ahead an add the sourcing the first time. And, no – you can't just cite other articles on Wikipedia for this, as per WP:CIRCULAR. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Tagging pages for deletion
Hello, Bruno,

If you review Criteria for speedy deletion, you'll see that pages can only be tagged for CSD G5 speedy deletion if there are no substantial contributions by other editors to the page. Please do not let your past conflicts with Starzoner obscure Wikipedia deletion policy. Not everything they touched warrants deletion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the advice . Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 02:29, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You are frickin' kidding me! I'm deleting some of Starzoner's articles (like Draft:Cars 4, Draft:Bad Boys 4 and Draft:20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (upcoming film)) and you come along MINUTES later to recreate them? This is ridiculous, Bruno. This is not some kind of contest, some kind of game. This competition with Starzoner is over. Please adjust your attitude. Liz Read! Talk! 03:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't do it for the purpose of competing, I only do it because they are drafts that will sooner or later be recreated. Also I am not recreating all his deleted drafts, only the ones that I considered with enough information. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 03:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ”I don't do it for the purpose of competing, I only do it because they are drafts that will sooner or later be recreated”. So...to be first then? What’s the expectation a new 20, 000 Leagues adaptation is coming along in the near future? Stop just copypasting sections from other articles into drafts too. At least rewrite it a bit. Rusted AutoParts  11:13, 22 Marc·h 2021 (UTC)
 * please stop looking for problems in places where no one calls you. I am willing to receive recommendations from other users but not from someone like you who makes the same mistakes as me but is only willing to criticize. Here and here you can see how you have created drafts starting from a fast redirection, and it is not bad, what if it is bad is then come to criticize me because I create drafts with little information. Currently I followed your advice and create my drafts with a little more information and try to expand them as fast as I can. You write to me again in order to criticize me again, I will directly precede to report you and that an administrator acts according to IBAN. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 13:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, what? Lawsuits? Who is threatening legal action here? I tried the feedback route when I first messaged you, you proceeded to frustrate with a load of whataboutism. Anyway, the two examples you picked manage to be the two I did that seeing that's apparently the only way I can hope to start a draft these days seeing as when I take my time I get edit conflicted with a draft that only has a source. Now since then you have stopped that, so I commend you for that, but seeing this new activity of copypasting others work, as well as making drafts for films that aren't guaranteed to be occurring is concerning to me. Rusted AutoParts  14:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Natural Light film poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Natural Light film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Classic Horror Story


The article A Classic Horror Story has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF. Created too early, should be deleted or moved to draftspace."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Rothko (film)
Well done with kicking off the draft and adding new content to it. I just have one question-- how did you find the Variety Insight page for the film? Are you signed up for the membership?  D ÅRTH B ØTTØ ( T • C ) 06:36, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * How very helpful-- thank you! And - pardon for me asking - would you happen to understand how companies in the database work? On the Rothko page, there's a link for Super Crispy, with an ID provided, but I get hit with the exorbitant paywall.  D ÅRTH B ØTTØ ( T • C ) 07:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Stardust (2007 film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 06:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bumblebee (film) into Draft:Untitled Bumblebee sequel. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Remember Me (2019 film)
Your edit to Remember Me (2019 film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Beast Alliance
Thanks for retargeting. If it's still a working title, maybe it's too early to swap (I dunno), but if you want to move to that Draft title at any point, just drop a line! -2pou (talk) 17:32, 30 March 2021 (UTC)