User talk:Brunswicker4Life

February 2012
I just reverted the edits you made to CJMO-FM and CFQM-FM. If you took the time to check them, you would see that all I did was group the multiple use of a source into one reference. What this does is make the "References" section neater by having the reference listed once rather than the same link being listed over-and-over again. I also corrected the url and added citation for blind url, your reverts resulted in the incorrect url being re-added to article, not to mention all the manual of style edits I made being removed. Since these were the only edits you made, according to your contribution list, it would be better to read up a little on editing, policy and manual of style before you start threatening blocks like you did on my talk page. I have been editing here for several years and have never received as much as warning, so to start with the highest level warning is not appropriate. If you seriously thought my edits were wrong, you should have started with the lowest level, now I have a level 5 warning on my talk page for no reason. Also, your comment about my edits being a slap in the face to other editors couldn't be any further from the truth. Any edit I make is with the intent to improve the article, not to make the editor who added the content look back. Cmr08 (talk) 21:26, 5 February 2012 (UTC)