User talk:Bruxton/Archives/2022/April

Orphaned non-free image File:Silly Boy Blue.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Silly Boy Blue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Maison de Jeanne
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 4,003 views

Your GA nomination of Milam Residence
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Milam Residence you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rublov -- Rublov (talk) 21:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milam Residence
The article Milam Residence you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Milam Residence for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rublov -- Rublov (talk) 22:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Eden of Coronet (guitar)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cyril Colnik
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyril Colnik you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ladnav no esool -- Ladnav no esool (talk) 14:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Scale Lane Footbridge
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Sharifi-ha House
— Maile (talk) 12:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


 * you know what? you and dumelow, you have an eye for catchy hooks. well done :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks this one was your hook! Bruxton (talk) 03:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * nah, you did all the heavy lifting :) i just gave it a snip and a polish here and there. cheers! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Ethel Ogden
Just letting you know that you forgot the nom credit for Ethel Ogden in prep 2. SL93 (talk) 21:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, it's in the wrong area. It should be right after the creator credit. SL93 (talk) 21:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * User:SL93 Thanks, my first time promoting a few so I will go there and clean up after myself!

File:Dancing with Dandelions.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dancing with Dandelions.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 19:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, in the future it is probably quicker and easier to approach me. I could have requested deletion, or just removed it from the article.

DYK nomination of Helen Hadsell
Hello! Your submission of Helen Hadsell at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 01:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Ruyi Bridge
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Memories on DYK, and don't miss video of Pink Floyd given to me! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 4,745 views at DYK.

dance and singing, peace doves and icecream --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:17, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

updated with a more prominent link to how to listen to the concert: Freiheit! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

William Beauchamp Nevill
Thank you for the review, and thank you for your excellent work in cleaning up the signature. In return I can maybe give you some insights into the subject of that biography, which I can't include in the article because I have no citations for it. Nevil was a man with various facets to his character.

On the negative side, the judge condemned him for his callous treatment of the young soldier that he cheated, and lawyers revealed how Nevill then went further by writing a letter saying that his victim should pay up when the fraudulent bills came to term. After leaving prison, Nevill compounded this by claiming innocence in the first chapter of his book, and showing no regret or shame. Also in the book, he says he tricked a fellow-prisoner into scalding his own feet with boiling water, again showing no regret. We can either say that he was just horrid, or we can speculate on whether a mental condition, such as narcissism or being a sociopath might explain it. Either way, that side of him was not likeable.

On the positive side, he writes elegantly, i.e. clear, concise and to the point. The likes of Henry James and Faulkner would be proud of him. That book reveals that he learned well at Eton, and had a high intelligence. it raises the question of why he did not go on to university, why he resigned his commission in the army, and why he only seemed able to find work in the office of his wife's father who was a trader. Another question is raised, as to why (before his first crime) he ended up in such massive debt, when the newspapers didn't say how he ran up that debt. While Nevill was alive, there was no talk in the papers about him living the high life or even going to weddings and receptions, at a time when newspapers would take any excuse to name-drop the aristocracy. On the face of it, he lived an unusually quiet life. Putting together his apparently quiet life, his unusually massive debt, his unexplained resignation from the army after doing well, one might wonder whether Nevill was being blackmailed for reasons which would have been hushed up at that time. Some of my past researches of that period show rent boys blackmailing their customers and going around wearing gold watches. One of the more powerful reasons why UK law was changed in the 1960s to make gay activity a lot more legal than it had been, was to stop all that blackmail. Blackmail might explain why Nevill got into debt again, and earned himself a second imprisonment. If that were the case, one could feel compassion for him, even though he had that nasty side.

Whatever the truth of the matter, it was a complex case, and I get the feeling that the judges knew the facts, and knew exactly what they were doing. It was better to simply imprison him for the crimes of fraud, and leave the rest of it alone, for his own sake and that of his family. All very sad, really. Storye book (talk) 09:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * interesting. I had never herd the term rent boy. I wonder if there are sealed documents in some court archive. I can see that you are a thorough researcher. Bruxton (talk) 13:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, my apologies. I had not realised that that was not a US term. I don't know whether they would have written down that material in the court record; they might have just dealt with it tacitly, due to it being illegal activity at that time. However there may well be something in the National Archive at Kew (London), or even more likely in letters in family records. Aristocratic family records tend to be kept for centuries, either in the remaining great houses, or in national archives. There is probably a lot of material in Nevill's life for a book or film, one day. Let's hope so. One striking element is how his life at Eton had prepared him for life in prison - it made him "clubbable" as he put it, so that he could very successfully survive socially and mentally in government positions, but also in the army and (in this case) in prison. Storye book (talk) 14:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Marriages in that time were not necessarily for love. And scandal and money always make a good movie. I would watch it. Bruxton (talk) 14:37, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * In Nevill's case, my guess is that it was more like Cole Porter's marriage; that is, to a "beard" who knew the situation, but they clearly loved each other as friends - Porter buying her all that extravagant, tasteless jewellery, and her rushing to his side when he had that accident. You could say, of course, that Linda Porter was following the money, but Mrs Nevill was the one with the money and Nevill had none. Yet the newspapers said that she faithfully visited him in prison, for years, and that he cried when she had to testify in court (though otherwise kept a stiff upper lip). Yup, quite a story. I don't have enough years left to write books and plays, but hopefully someone else will. Storye book (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)