User talk:BryHealth/Ewing family of tumors

Peer Review
Peer review guidelines -Check for readability: topic is introduced clearly and concisely in lead paragraph, includes summary of subsequent article sections. Overall, article is well organized, covers information relevant to topic, and utilizes appropriate language/grammar. -Adherence to topic / Not getting off track: strong adherence to topic, no extraneous tangents. -Organization & Flow: good organization and flow. -Use of images and figures: no images or figures contained within article. -Proper use of citations: references listed at end of article, in-text citation using reference template still pending. -Paraphrasing: again, clear and appropriate language used throughout article. -Quality Sources, i.e. resources open to the public: sources are appropriate, completely filled-out, and most are readily available for public access. -Check for bias and equal-sided arguments: neutral, objective statements. -Provide productive and professional critique: Clay, overall great job! The article was very informative and followed the assignment guidelines well. Aside from the pending in-text citations, I'd just make sure to add headings within the sandbox for each section that way each will have a link within a contents box near the start of your article.

Best, Alex Achavez0921 (talk) 14:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)