User talk:Bryan Seecrets

Banned films
Bryan, I'm curious about your edits to Banned films. The factual content looks good (although I admit I haven't checked it for accuracy); however, you also added a couple of paragraphs of explanatory text that seem very point-of-view and biased in favor of Malaysian censorship. Was this your intent? I suspect that English is not your first language, so I want to find out what you were trying to say, before I try to recast those paragraphs into a less inflammatory tone. :) Thanks. (Reply on my talk page or Talk:Banned films, please.) --Quuxplusone 23:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis
Yikes! Bryan, please don't copy text from http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Biographies+and+Profiles/Biographies/Jacqueline+Bouvier+Kennedy+First+Lady+1961-1963.htm and put it on Wikipedia, if you didn't write it. That's copyright infringement, and it's a very bad thing, legally speaking, which Wikipedia needs to avoid at all costs. --Quuxplusone 23:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Misinformation re: Star Trek: The Section 31 Files
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Kirok of L&#39;Stok 11:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * But, Star Trek: The Section 31 Files is currently on hiatus after 3.05, possibly in favor of his original sci-fi tale, Far Horizons. --Bryan Seecrets 14:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Prove it. Wikipedia is about verifiable facts, NOT opinions, wishes or ScuttleButt. If you can give a reference for your statement I will be happy to allow it to stand but you and I both know that you have been told that the only way that S31 will be put into hiatus is if you continue your campaign of misinformation. The same goes for ST Pioneers as well - get your facts straight before you post.--Kirok of L&#39;Stok 22:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked. --Kirok of L&#39;Stok 22:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Kirok of L&#39;Stok 09:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I know, I know, I just leave this alone. S31 is currently on hiatus, you haven't aware of it yet?!


 * Being in hiatus means that there is no work being done on the production and there is none planned for an extended length of time. Whilst it is true that there has been no episode for two months as against their usual one a month, you have to take into account that they released *two* episodes in December and, like most people, they took some time off over Christmas ... plus Eric is recovering from a serious car accident - weren't you aware of that? I happen to know that Mak has passed the files to Eric yesterday for post production. You have to be able to verify what you post and after your previous record I am not willing to accept ANY unverified material from you. You MUST give a link to something that verifies your posting, I can't stress that strongly enough. This is not a forum that deals in rumour and conjecture, it is an encyclopedia that deals in FACTS.


 * If you post inflammatory, unverified material one more time you WILL be blocked and the responsibility for this action will lie solely with you. YOU will have caused this to happen to yourself. I urge you NOT to do it.--Kirok of L&#39;Stok 22:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I didn't post inflammatory and unverified material as of now. --Bryan Seecrets 19:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I've recently heard S31 has ended in a cliffhanger, isn't it true? --Bryan Seecrets 03:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Bryan, you're having me on, aren't you? They've just posted a new episode THIS WEEK! Surely to goodness you aren't going to start so soon with your "are they ended?" posts as soon as they have published an episode? At least you have had the decency to post it on your User page instead of the Star Trek: Fan Productions article.--Kirok of L&#39;Stok 08:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Recreation - Laura Yonker
You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. RichMac (Talk) 00:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Then how am I going to get an approval from the administrators before doing so --Bryan Seecrets 14:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Harriet_Owen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Harriet_Owen.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Malay Wikipedia
Please do not add interwikilinks for Malay articles unless they actually exist on the Malay Wikipedia. ms:Power Rangers, ms:Power Rangers: Zeo, and ms:Power Rangers: SPD do not exist.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 20:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Good idea
. —Centrx→talk &bull; 14:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

DEFAULTSORT
Hi, with regards to your edit to Clea DuVall, it's not necessary to add a sortkey to the categories if the template is present. For more info, see Help:Category. Hope this helps... Belovedfreak 22:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Gabrielle (Xena)
Hi. You added the following text to this article: " 	The origins of her name lies in the Xena Scrolls herself. Her name Gabrielle is neither originated from Greek, nor fit traditional Ancient Greek religious concepts, but it is rather than a French given name. It does, however, have a grammatically correct Greek feminine ending and contains no anti-Greek sounds (pronounced as Gab-ree-el-lay)."

Can you provide some references for that? I haven't heard of it before. Bards 15:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Uh. Yeah, see if I can do that. --Bryan Seecrets 02:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I found a reference to that: A WOMAN OF DECEPTION: GABRIELLE???!


 * Thanks Bryan. Any objection if I rearrange the text, so that it reads better? Also, you can't quote all of that as a "fact", because even in that article some of it is the author's guesswork. Lastly, the scrolls are a fictional source; we shouldn't pretend they are real. Bards 20:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Beast Fist
Do not add any unsourced speculation concerning the title of a series yet to finish in Japan and its adaptation in the States.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 16:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Butlerian Jihad edits
Hi. Sorry, but I just reverted your last edits to two paragraphs in the Butlerian Jihad article.

The changes to the first paragraph you edited did not make sense as English. The addition of the BG and Spacing Guild to the second paragraph did not really contribute that much (it is true that they developed in response to the disappearance of computers, of course) and distract from the main point of the paragraph, that Mentats are the main human replacement for "thinking machines". --SandChigger 02:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Raiden Fighters.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Raiden Fighters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Apophis
Hi! Noticed you were advertising (maybe not the best word) your new game on Wikipedia, so I hopped over the the Sauer forums to read your post. It sound pretty interesting to me--but then again, some games sound interesting while they are very dull (and vice-versa). Any plans on setting up a web site? (SourceForge projects come with some kind of server thing, I think--consider SourceForge for project hosting.) Hope the game works out! (Oh, and also "Though its title referred only to the Egyptian mythological demon of darkness and chaos, it refers to the Greek name of Apep"? That's really confusing. Could you reword that?) &mdash; SheeEttin {T/C} 02:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is, but I can still say the game is still in early phases of pre-production and is currently part of the Sauerbraten game engine (alongside with Eisenstern and its FPS game module). The title refers to the Greek name of the Egyptian demon of darkness and chaos, Apep, in fact. Bryan Seecrets 07:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * My web site for my game is here at: http://apophis-game.sourceforge.net/. Don't delete my Apophis article. Bryan Seecrets 09:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Unsourced
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. --Yamla 14:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I know, I do not want to add content without citing verifiable sources. Bryan Seecrets 14:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


 * This is your last warning. Do not add content without providing a reliable source, such as you did to Emmy Rossum.  See WP:V and WP:BLP.  --Yamla 17:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop advertising your fan film all over Wikipedia. IrishGuy talk 19:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I know. I have to read the NPOV tutorial and reliable sources before creating an article. Fan Wars is not a fan film, but an open source film. Bryan Seecrets 19:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, the description quite clearly states: Fan Wars is an open source film made by the fans, for the fans of Star Wars, Star Trek, and others. That is a fan film. IrishGuy talk 19:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Fan Wars
Well, given that Fan Wars is a fan film and a re-imagining of the 1999 film of the same name, it should be similar to the 2008 film Fanboys, because it will be a feature-length open movie. I'm at Celebration in the rain, I've waited in line for the Star Wars special editions and prequels, as well as the anticipated Half-Life sequel, the future Star Trek productions, the 50th anniversary of Malaysia's independence and the Space Age. Making this film is very important to the world to me.

The film's page on Celtx Project Central is perhaps one of its reliable sources. Can I create that article on the film project I'm working on with no blatant advertising, but with neutral point of view, and reliable and verifiable sources? I want to establish its notability. --Bryan Seecrets 07:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * There's no similarity between your project and something like Fanboys, which is *not* an open-source film, and has no connection to the short film of the same name. Your film has not been made, you were not involved in any way with the original fan trailer, and based on your posting history on TFN it's very likely that the film will not ever get made. If, somehow, it does get made, then, and only then, would there be the *possibility* of it being notable enough for an encyclopedic article, but that's very unlikely, based on current information. As it stands now, it's completely non-notable. Yes, it's important you you. But important to the greater community? Hardly. The Celtx page is utterly useless as far as reliable sources are concerned, as it's entirely based on information provided by you - it's not an independent third-party site, as referenced here. Futhermore, Wikipedia is not a personal website for your to present information on your own project - go get your own webhost for that. If your prject is deemed notable, let others determine that and write the article - you should also read this page for more information about conflicts of interest. TheRealFennShysa 15:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Apophis (game)
A template has been added to the article Apophis (game), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Lijnema 20:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:10000 copy.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:10000 copy.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Fan_Wars_teaser_poster.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fan_Wars_teaser_poster.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 13:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kara Dennison
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kara Dennison, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RaidenIV.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:RaidenIV.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Creature Features
Template:Creature Features has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. William 02:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:RaidenIII.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RaidenIII.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:14, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Bryan Seecrets/Fan Wars (2008 film)
User:Bryan Seecrets/Fan Wars (2008 film), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bryan Seecrets/Fan Wars (2008 film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Bryan Seecrets/Fan Wars (2008 film) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Jackie at Chapin.jpg


The file File:Jackie at Chapin.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jennifer Van Dyck


The article Jennifer Van Dyck has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable actor, only external link is IMDb"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Planetary Radio


The article Planetary Radio has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:28, 23 December 2022 (UTC)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:28, 23 December 2022 (UTC)