User talk:Bryanbaophan

(Bryanbaophan (talk) 07:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC))

Comment
,, this editor edited all our pages while still blocked, using the same user name but clearly another proxy. I've blocked that again. Any comments regarding this topic on pages other than this should be blocked as either evading a block, sock puppetry or proxy editing. for the sake of completeness, I'll answer his question in detail below. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * User:GB fan beat me to the salting (thanks!) OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:45, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Holiday Beach Danang Hotel & Resort


A tag has been placed on Holiday Beach Danang Hotel & Resort, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 09:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Your sources were all company press releases, not independent third-party references
 * I can't see any claim of notability anyway, it's just another medium-sized hotel
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * your text consisted entirely of the location and facilities of the hotel, standard brochure fodder
 * You had a totally unsourced awards section, but no hint of criticisms of the hotel


 * This IP is from my company and I am one of the 2 editors&mdash;You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. You have a financial stake in promoting this topic. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
 * You cannot edit your hotel article or any other while you are blocked. You cannot edit from proxies or use multiple accounts to evade any block. Any attempt to create this or similar article by any account will result in deletion and blocking

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)