User talk:Bryanna nicole8/sandbox

Peer Review
Overall your information is thorough and very informative. There is some room to expand on this idea of leaving the gender open for the child to perform, for example, it may be helpful to the general audience to define or further explain gender as a performance as is not always a commonly held notion. When you talk about mediatization you could also mention some celebrities/public figures that have had gender reveal parties. You could also mention the varying side of the argument that does not like pink to denote girl and blue to denote boy, or other binary linked ideas.

Plan
I plan to read my third source and go through the same process I did for my first two sources. Once I have a list of information that I think will be beneficial to include in the overall article, I will then focus on organizing that information into different subcategories. Within each subcategory, I will be able to take the information I have, slightly expand upon it, and then formulate it in a way that makes it easily understandable but also substantial enough. After I feel as though the work that I have done is up to par, I will then start to figure out a way in which I can incorporate my information into the original article, but also how that original article can be edited to make it a better piece overall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryanna nicole8 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Feedback on draft
Bryanna: You've pulled out lots of great information from the sources, and it's all written in a clear and easily understandable way. I look forward to reading the full draft. Mbrzycki (talk) 19:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)