User talk:Bryanteadon

 Hello Bryanteadon, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Bryanteadon, good luck, and have fun. -- Pam D  22:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of EPRT
A tag has been placed on EPRT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rorshacma (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Advanced Data Hub


The article Advanced Data Hub has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No apparent notability (coverage in independent sources): no evidence that it should have an encyclopedia article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  21:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform for Real-Time


The article Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform for Real-Time has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability - only external link is to product website.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  21:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * PamD -- This is a major software package used by Financial institutions across the world. It's applicable to financial institutions which have classically have been closed-door in terms of providing information to the extended Internet.  The product builds upon RMDS which you'll clearly find in linked in circles and other pages.  TREP-RT has not reached a critical mass audience but is still extremely relevant.  Email me to confirm further, I'll provide you PDF documentation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryanteadon (talk • contribs) 22:03, 25 January 2012‎   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryanteadon (talk • contribs) 21:22, 25 January 2012‎


 * Hi, Only just spotted this comment of yours. As it says on the "PROD" or "Proposed deletion" message, and in slightly different wording above here, "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. However, please explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page." (My emphasis). You gave no explanation either in your edit summary (you don't seem to "do" edit summaries - they are very helpful for other editors) or on the article talk page as to why you had removed the PROD banner, so I took the article to AfD. You now need to produce reasons there to argue why it should be kept in the encyclopedia. Unless and until it is WP:NOTABLE it has no place in the encyclopedia. Pam  D  22:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm just getting used to the editing process, I will include edit summaries in the future. I will also include more links.  This fits the notable criteria. Bryanteadon (talk) 14:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The proposed deletion states that the software is not notable. Thousands of companies use this software globally, and it is a market segment in it's own right. You will also find it on people's resumes, case in point :  http://www.linkedin.com/in/gszub  Bryanteadon (talk) 15:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Data Access Control System


A tag has been placed on Data Access Control System requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pam D  21:16, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform for Real-Time for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform for Real-Time is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform for Real-Time until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pam D  21:35, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * This information is relevant to understand the proprietary software platform which drives financial markets. This should not be removed, there is an extremely small amount of data about the system online.  This is a push to get more information about the systems online and available to users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryanteadon (talk • contribs) 22:03, 25 January 2012‎


 * But Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not the trade press, not a soapbox, not an advertising medium. It has articles on topics which are already WP:NOTABLE. Anyway, you are arguing in the wrong place: you should make your points at the AfD (Article for Deletion) discussion. And please sign your comments on talk pages (using the button on the edit bar or by typing ~ ), and use either : to indent your reply or * to give it a bullet point, to make it easier for other editors to see. Thanks.  Pam  D  22:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I think I've argued in the proper place now -- please advise. Bryanteadon (talk) 15:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * No, you need to argue convincingly, at the AfD discussion, to say why this article should not be deleted.  To see the form at of an AfD discussion see the day's listing.  If you want to keep the article, post a "Keep" comment with explanation. It is not a vote, but the closing administrator will look at and evaluate the arguments used by editors saying "Keep" and "Delete". 85.211.13.188 (talk) 10:15, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Advanced Data Hub for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Advanced Data Hub is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Advanced Data Hub until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pam D  21:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Page is relevant to the 'Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform for Real-Time' article. The page is currently a stub for more information as I have time to write it. The page is as notable as "RMDS" or "TREP-RT" pages. Bryanteadon (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Advanced Distribution Server


A tag has been placed on Advanced Distribution Server requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 21:35, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Advanced Distribution Server


The article Advanced Distribution Server has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced article with no assertion of notability. It is unclear what the actual subject of this article is, so searching for sources is near impossible.  In current state, this article appears to be WP:OR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 16:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

TREP
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of TREP, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://selfindulgence.org/Thomson_Reuters_Enterprise_Platform_for_Real-Time.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TREP


A tag has been placed on TREP, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)