User talk:Bryden12

August 2009
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Apparition11 Complaints / Mistakes  20:22, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.

The recent edit you made to Stone Cold Steve Austin has been reverted, as it introduced unsourced or poorly sourced negative or controversial biographical material. Please do not continue to add such information. Thank you. Pseudomonas(talk) 16:47, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: Hey
I'm sorry, but what are you talking about? My message to you was regarding your addition of an unosurced theme name on Curt Hawkins and Zack Ryder here, which had no mention of Kelly Kelly whatsoever. Are you sure you have responded to the right person? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * that has been discussed multiple times, and WP:CONSENSUS is to not have a separate page for him. The relevant discussions can be seen at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling/Archive_68, Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling/Archive_70 and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling/Archive_71, and on the Curt Hawkins and Zack Ryder talk page at Talk:Curt_Hawkins_and_Zack_Ryder. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * A) please do not start a new section for every comment, you can use the one heding and add subsequent comments to that section. B) Sources must be provided for information you wish to add to articles. C) No, he's not going to get his own page. I linked the discussions above so you could read them and understand why, he's not going to get his own page. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC) when is hawkings coming back hey when is hawkings coming back if hes not coming he needs to get put in an inactive list


 * If he does something notable on his own, then yes, he will get a page. Since he's only had about 10 matches since he stopped teaming with Hawkins, and had pretty much no singles before that, there's no point in him having his own page. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:27, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

what would he have to do win the ecw champions ship and what happend to hawkins where is he


 * I don't know. Please remember, wikipedia is not a forum. Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

what happend to jamie noble,festus,kung fu knaki, and them
 * Well, since you've been blocked this point is now moot, but still... Asking me questions like "who runs the TNA wiki" or "is such-and-such" inactive is not why I am here. That is a violation of WP:FORUM; if you want to discuss the reasons someone has not appeared on tv, go to a forum and discuss it there. When you return, read up on wikipedi'a policies, and then follow them. You can't just add information 'cause you "heard it somewhere"; it must be sourced with a reliable source. Read WP:V, WP:BLP and WP:5P, and start editing in accordance with them. If you need help, ask for it. Stop spamming people's talk pages asking for Ryder to get his own article, it's not going to happen for a while, like I've already told you. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 11:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 17:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Jericho. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chris Jericho was changed by Bryden12 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-09T20:18:51+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Nikki ♥  311   20:20, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: Yes you did mean to...as you have vandalized several pages. Per consensus, Ryder will not be getting his own page right now. If you continue to be disruptive and vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. I suggest you start making more constructive (and sourced) edits. Nikki ♥  311   20:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC) ok im sorry though what should i do i can't edit wwe wiki becuz its protected and who runs the tna superstars wiki hey what happend to festus is he inactive This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC) sorry gary but it is true
 * If it's true, include a citation to a reliable source. You received three warnings above before this warning because of the same problem. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:49, 9 August 2009 (UTC)how man al i know is she is supposed to be out for 3 months becuz she had surgery
 * If you don't have a reliable source, don't add the information. Saying, "I just know it's true" violates Wikipedia's policy on original research and verifiability. It's as simple as that. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

oww wait umm yester day there was a saying on this site that the rock was returning in december 2009 hey bwhats up with
 * Yes, that was unsourced at best, but appears to be vandalism. It was removed every time it was added, and the article has been semi-protected to try to stop it from being added. You were one of the people who added it. You seem to have the wrong idea about what Wikipedia is all about. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to give opinions and rumors. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. If it can't be sourced, then it is not to be included in our articles. If you honestly want to edit constructively here, you should read our 5 pillars to get the basic idea of what Wikipedia is all about. Apparition11  Complaints / Mistakes  21:18, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. umm why did i just get blocked
 * For ignoring repeated warnings about violating Wikipedia rules. If I may make a suggestion, how about reading Wikipedia's policies on verifiability and reliable sources during your block? GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

i didn't do any fucking thing else
 * What about this? Apparition11  Complaints / Mistakes  21:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

im new to this so cut me some slack
 * You were cut some slack, you were only blocked 48 hours. When that expires, if you will take the advice that people are giving you, you'll find that you'll be given the benefit of doubt more often and not run into nearly as many problems. However, if you continue to insert all of the vandalism and unsourced speculation that you did before the block, the next block will likely be indefinite. It's your choice. If you do decide to try to edit within the rules, you'll find that most editors here are more than willing to help you edit constructively and will be much more friendly towards you. Apparition11  Complaints / Mistakes  21:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

ok so what do i do know
 * I would suggest taking GaryColemanFan's advice about using this time to read WP:V and WP:RS. You would also do well to read WP:5P. If you read, grasp, and apply these, then you should be alright and have little trouble when your block expires. Apparition11  Complaints / Mistakes  23:15, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

ok am i unblocked now well we need to talk undertaker is comming back at hell in a cell ppv

Re:
I have no idea. Listen, asking me that violates WP:FORUM. If don't want to get blocked again I suggest you read the policies linked for you above and start editing in a constructive manner. If you need help with a wikipedia related matter, then drop me a note. Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 10:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. jhey hello am i unblocked ow

Re: Ryder
Hawkins wrestling in FCW does not automatically mean that Rder should get his own page. The same points as the last time you asked still apply. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 09:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC) yea he should cuz hawkings is staying in fcw

== zack ryder ==

if u think zack ryder should get his own page reply to this message yea he should

Re: WWE
I'm sorry, but was there actually reason you posted a comment on my talk page? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 13:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC) yea

November 2009
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:42, 27 November 2009 (UTC)