User talk:BsMurphy

I would like to request a review of the Wiki "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newman%27s_energy_machin" It is completely biased and leverages NBS content from a scientific 'skeptics' website, not the government site of which they quote data, and do not present both sides of the argument. Also, the site falsely states "the scientific community rejects Joseph Newmans claims" is a completely fabricated lie, as I have 40 scientists affidavits saying the exact opposite. Go to Joseph Westley Newman Wiki I'm constructing which gives a much better non slanderous description of the inventors life and work.

The Joseph Newman Energy Corporation Interanational and is about to launch production of it's products, and this site "Newman Energy Machine" is complete and total one sided slander that will by its intention cost us money if it is allowed to stay published. Please remove the whole one sided, biased, slanderous Wiki pageBsMurphy (talk) 01:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newman's energy machine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NBS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Joseph Newman's energy machine
Hello, BsMurphy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 23:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)