User talk:Bsadowski1/Archives/2011/June

Block settings
Why is it that when you block block-evaders, you typically do not allow them to use Emailuser or edit their talk page? Is that because you are trying to make them appeal the block on their main account? Just curious.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * There are particular vandals who have a history of talk page and email abuse, and their socks get the full block on sight. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. The idea is to prevent them from wasting our time.  Hit them with the flyswatter.  Absolutely no point in engaging:  ignore.  They're not worth your time. Antandrus  (talk) 01:30, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Solipsism blocks (as I call them) are reserved for long-term abusers whose MO post-block is to abuse talk page or email privileges. If an admin's whipping out the solipsism block on sight or first offense, odds are there's a LOBU user behind the façade. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 03:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Timeline of Philippine–American War articl
I see that you have edited the Timeline of Philippine–American War article in the not too distant past. I have recently started on a rewrite of that article, and am soliciting input and participation from interested editors. If interested, please see Talk:Timeline of Philippine–American War for more info. Please comment there as appropriate. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

LOL
Guess who's using an open proxy from the Syrian ARAB Republic? xD - A l is o n  ❤ 07:14, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

What's the damn use?
Gonna e-mail you. Keep a weather eye open, matey. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppet?
You blocked SineBot1 as having an inappropriate user name (which is obviously true), impersonation (which I'm having trouble understanding if they were blocked before making any edits) and sockpuppetry. The editor has repeatedly requested an unblock to change their username, and has been declined multiple times. Their most recent request was on their IP talk page. I'm inclined to unblock, but the sockpuppetry charge gives me pause; do you recall who they were suspected of being a sockpuppet of, and why? Thank you. --  At am a  頭 19:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It could of been a sockpuppet at the time. But the username (impersonation? of SineBot) along with another reason I forgot they looked like a sock. Feel free to unblock them now, but they should really consider a username change. --Bsadowski1 09:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Butrimonys massacre
On 9 September 1941, shortly after the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union, the Jews of Butrimonys were massacred by Einsatzgruppen and Lithuanian collaborators. Rounded up and marched along a road, they were lined up beside a mass grave and machine-gunned. According to the Jäger Report, 740 Jews were murdered in one day: 67 men, 370 women, and 303 children. what????????????? in the whole town lived only 600 and only 300 were jews, so where others came from?????? if in other surrounding cities supposedly other local jews were killed???? did jews came from the hell????? or it is a fraud??? and show me bones of those 740 people supposedly killed there...where bones have disappeared??????
 * Do you have a reliable source for your information? A source is provided for the article's information, so unless you have another source which backs your version and which would be counted as more reliable, what is in the article should stay. --  Phantom Steve .alt/ talk \[alternative account of Phantomsteve] 23:49, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * To be precise, where did you get the population of 600 and the Jewish population of 300? If you can provide a reliable source for that, we can look into this further.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 00:22, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!
Just a quick thumbs up & thank you for your prompt handling of that OTRS/BLP/sock puppet issue! Asav (talk) 02:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

selamatkan aku
Hello, are you steward? Help me! Because I was blocked there (accusation) canvassing at Indonesian Wikipedia. And lately I've never done anything like that. Just look list contribution at there. Please (if possible) revoked the block status.

Oh ya, I also ask to release the SockPuppet I was there named id:User: Erik Evermtus at Indonesian Wikipedia because this account will be used as a substitute if the main account stolen by others such as id:User:Kenrick95Sock. Thank you --Erik Evrest 04:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Question
I'd seen this guy before, and you recently blocked him as an obvious sockpuppet. A sock for certain, but of whom? If it's one of those things and you won't say I'll understand, but I'm curious. Cheers :> Doc   talk  02:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, it's a obvious sockpuppet of someone at least. Perhaps of that IP that they edited on the talk page of? --Bsadowski1 02:40, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I hope not, as that would be a bad sign. A worse sign, I mean. Good block! Doc   talk  02:53, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Nope; not me. See their talk. 114.79.62.225 (talk) Jack 12:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Template:Single namespace
Hello. I really don't see why this should be protected. You've basically stopped me, the only editor who has edited the template, from editing it. The template is not that visible, only the templates that transclude are but they only transclude it if they're transcluded in the wrong namespace. If this template was vandalised, it would barely do anything and I would revert it immediately.  McLerristarr &#124;  Mclay1  11:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I understand, but it was transcluded in over 12,000 pages/categories. You want a vandal to vandalise it? It may be subtle vandalism even. --Bsadowski1 21:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * It's an unlikely target for vandalism. I wouldn't mind semi-protection though.  McLerristarr &#124;  Mclay1  02:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:34, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Since you appear to be active now
Could you use some suppression on the most recent IP revision on CarolMooredc's page and extend the semi? Qwyrxian (talk) 04:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Try reading the _whole_ timestamp next time. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:18, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Doh! Sorry! :D --Bsadowski1 05:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Forgot one
You forgot to revdelete this.Jasper Deng (talk) 21:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

sockpuppet
Given the edit summaries and, do you think an SPI is warranted? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)