User talk:Bsarma

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Emma Rhodes, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Emma Rhodes appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Emma Rhodes has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Emma Rhodes and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Emma Rhodes with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Emma Rhodes.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. StephenBuxton (talk) 16:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Margaret Rhodes (artist)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Margaret Rhodes (artist), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Margaret Rhodes (artist) is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Margaret Rhodes (artist), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emma Rhodes


The article Emma Rhodes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No third party sources, tagged for notability for a year, does not seem to be notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 22:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Margaret Rhodes (artist)


The article Margaret Rhodes (artist) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable, unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 20:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)