User talk:Bsdarty

"Related Material" on Godzilla 1998 film article
I see you've re-added your "Related Material" content on the Godzilla 1998 film page. I've taken the liberty of removing it once again because it's once more the same unsourced trivia you've been constantly re-adding, which is in violation of Wiki's WP:OR and WP:RS guidelines. WP:OR clearly states that '''The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material for which no reliable, published sources exist. This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources''', which is what you've done by constantly re-adding your "Related Material" content which you've claimed is in "direct correlations between the original film and the 1998 film", despite not providing any reliable verifiable sources, such as you did here. You again re-added your content in June 2015, to which again it was deleted for the same reason it was deleted in the first place, trivia and unsourced claims.

And now you've re-added it again, this time citing your sources. I would have let this alone at first, however, your sources are barely related to the topic/subjects that you're trying to present. Many of the sources you provided mention one film but don't even mention the other, much less even confirm the connection between the 54 film and the 98 film and most of the sources you provided came from blogs and fan-sites, not reliable/verifiable sources. WP: OR clearly states that you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented, the sources you provided were not related to the topic of the "direct correlations" between the '54 film and '98 film and more importantly, your sources did not even support your claims. You just cited random sources to imply a conclusion that was not supported by your sources, which is original research.

A reliable/verifiable source can be an author who's had his work published on the subject, or in this case, the studio, writers, producers or directors of the movie, like a quote or comment from them. But since no verifiable source has been cited that confirms the "correlations" or "associations" between the 54 film and 98 film, you need to keep it off the page until you find a reliable source that proves your claims. WP:RS clearly states that  If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

If you continue re-adding your content without providing reliable sources that prove and support your claims, I will be forced to bring in a third party to help settle this. Armegon (talk) 05:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)