User talk:Bsender

Hello-thanks for the edits on the Kant page. You probably should have checked the Kant talk page before adding such a lengthy exposition, which will not stand without condensing and clean-up. There are several people watching that page who have Kant as their area of concentration, and there are problems with your addition.

First, your notes do not fit the format per Wikipedian policy. Second, a hypothetical statement is not an "if...than" statement, it is an "If...then" form. More importantly, you have concentrated on the 'A' deduction. This may be considered inappropriate, and an exposition on A and B versions may entail POV, which is a good reason why the section has not been written. Also, his epistemology is covered in the article on The Critique of Pure Reason, and there is no need for a lengthy essay on this page.Amerindianarts 17:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alice K. Hartley


Hello, Bsender. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alice K. Hartley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:01, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dana-Chisnell.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Dana-Chisnell.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: Not all Creative Commons licenses are sufficiently free for use on Wikipedia.  Those restricting commercial use (NC) or restricting derivative works (ND) are not acceptable.  WP:Free licenses provides a list of acceptable licenses. -- Whpq (talk) 14:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)