User talk:Bsitts09

Welcome!
Hello, Bsitts09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. UW Dawgs (talk) 00:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joe Klanderman


The article Joe Klanderman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 21:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Joe Klanderman moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Joe Klanderman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 01:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Klanderman (March 3)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Joe_Klanderman Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wholly fails WP:NGRIDIRON

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:46, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

It is sufficiently notable for inclusion. Almost all coordinators in division one college football are included on Wikipedia. Your reasoning is wrong. Bsitts09 (talk) 16:14, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Joe Klanderman concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joe Klanderman, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Joe Klanderman concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joe Klanderman, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Joe Klanderman


Hello, Bsitts09. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joe Klanderman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

March 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jerome Tang, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Additionally, my edit you reverted was a removal of unsourced content, Rockchalk 717 23:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Please be familiar with WP:OTHERSTUFF before making edits purely based on stuff existing or not existing in other articles. Pick 100 random articles on Wikipedia and I bet every single one or almost every single one has multiple policy violations. WP:VERIFY is a basic fundamental of Wikipedia. Most coaches with articles have had their articles for years and have extremely well documented date and place of births. Jerome Tang does not. I added those citations of the already existing source so his date and place of birth can be easily verified if someone chooses to challenge it because almost anything on Wikipedia that is unsourced can be challenged and removed, regardless of who it is, from world leaders and world famous actors and musicians to professional athletes almost nobody has heard of, if a date of birth isn't sourced, it can be challenged. Do not revert that edit again. There are so few instances were removal of citations are ok, this is definitely not one of them.-- Rockchalk 717 05:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)