User talk:Bspencer11

Speedy deletion nomination of Nirvaha
A tag has been placed on Nirvaha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Nirvaha and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RP459 (talk) 18:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nirvaha


The article Nirvaha has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no news hits on Google News for this company, minor coverage appears in blogs. Fails WP:ORG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RP459 (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nirvaha
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nirvaha, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RP459 (talk) 00:51, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia, please do not take my proposed deletion of Nirvaha personally, on an interesting note you have just seen the entire deletion process from start to finish: speedy, followed by contested prod, and now articles for deletion. In response to your post on Talk:Nirvaha please have a look at WP:ORG for what is required for a company or organization to have an article on Wikipedia. Please feel free to ask any questions by leaving me a message on my talk page. RP459 (talk) 00:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

“Notability” of firms
Doesn't seem like anyone else is going to answer your question! (Wikipedia culture sucks sometimes! Well, most of the time, actually.)  Anyway, you want to read the “notability” guidelines and the “notability” guidelines specific to firms. And, as you might infer, Wikipedians tend to use terms such as “notable” and “reliable” in their own, peculiar way, without letting you know that they've stopped writing English. Not much to be done for that now. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 08:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Nirvaha
The Nirvaha article has now been deleted as it didn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The notability guidelines have been built up by the community over over the years and are constantly evolving - they are not always easy to understand, and people do discuss and debate and amend them all the time. One of the things we are concerned about is people using the popularity and high Google status of Wikipedia to promote themselves, their favourite local band, their company or a product their company makes if any of these things are not already being written about. This does mean that well intentioned edits, such as yours, can get jumped upon, and the explanations may be rather short. Sorry about that. The idea of Wikipedia is that we are a collection of existing reliable and established knowledge - we not not cover unknown or little known items, we do not create knowledge, and we do not promote new companies seeking to establish themselves.

Let me know when you are ready to write your next article and I'll assist you.  SilkTork  *YES! 16:27, 27 August 2009 (UTC)