User talk:Bsrikanth90

Nomination of GudimetlaChennaiah for deletion


A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GudimetlaChennaiah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/GudimetlaChennaiah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  12:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your article GudimetlaChennaiah
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page GudimetlaChennaiah to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. --Jakob (talk)  12:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Anupmehra, fellow Wikipedia editor. I noticed you recently created an article in Telugu language on English Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contribution, we cannot accept articles written in languages other than English. The article is now listed at Pages needing translation into English for discussion. If the article is not rewritten in English within the next two weeks it will be listed for deletion and/or moved to the Telugu Wikipedia. One more thing, even when you translate the article into English language, it is not guaranteed that it will stay given that we have inclusion criteria, meeting not may result in deletion. In general, subjects that have been written about in detail in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources qualify for inclusion on Wikipedia. I hope, it does help. You may reply to this message editing section header and leaving your post below to this. Happy editing! Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  17:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)