User talk:Bsroiaadn/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 03:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Gibson Melody Maker link
Thanks for the info on the new Melody Maker! I've edited the article to include it. The page is now among the "References", so I removed it from "External Links". Thanks again for helping to keep the article current! Respectfully, SamBlob 12:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Zodiac killer
Your addition of the external link has been reverted per WP:MOS. That site is already used as a reference, and can thus not be reused as an external link. Jeffpw 08:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't realize that. Thank you for informing me. Bsroiaadn 08:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Swiftness
I don't know how you do it, but you seem to beat me to nearly every revert against vandalism. Haha. I would give you the barnstar, but I'm not even sure where to go to get the template for it. If/when I find it, I will be sure to award it to you, though. Bsroiaadn 08:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * That's quite all right. I have far too many barnstars anyway. Though for future reference, see Barnstars. Thanks – Qxz 08:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University
I'm reverting a known banned user. This has been a persistent problem that Thatcher131 is aware of. In a new twist, the user has actually posted on Thatcher131's talk page effectively admitting to being the banned user and expressing contempt for the Arbom decision.

As I understand it there is no limit to how many times a banned user's attempts to disrupt a page can be reverted. I assume Thatcher131 is off-line right now. I am hoping he will semi-protect the page when he gets back.

Please confirm that this is acceptable.

Thanks & regards Bksimonb 16:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * If it is to combat vandalism, then it is fine to revert a page as many times as needed. The Three-revert rule article says it is perfectly acceptable to revert a page as many times, as need be, if it is due to vandalism, as long as it is obvious vandalism. Bsroiaadn 16:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, report him as using another name to get around the ban. That is also against the rules. Bsroiaadn 16:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Plagiarism Removal
I'm afraid your script "Twinkle" is reverting a large section of the article Stochelo Rosenberg that has been plagiarized. Please see the article's discussion page. I've since re-removed the section, but it may happen again. dq 18:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I find a lot of people just delete stuff for no reason. I apologize. I figured it was another case of someone deleting things because they're testing wikipedia or they delete it to put a single sentence that isn't very good, or something of that sort. I will be more careful. Bsroiaadn 09:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, at least an edit war did not ensue. dq 15:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Gibson Blackbird
Nice work on merging the Gibson Blackbird article into the Gibson Thunderbird article. Very professional, in my opinion. Very nice work. I'm glad I noticed you did that. I'll have to think about that if I ever make a new guitar-related article, whether or not it should get it's own article or be incorporated into another. Thank you. I might be reading some other articles of yours to help me more to become a better wikipedian, as well. Bsroiaadn 12:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the amazing compliment! I'm not sure how good an example I am, though.  I've only been here a few months, and I'm not too certain of all the rules yet. Good luck with all your endeavours! Respectfully, SamBlob 01:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

dont try do shut my mouse
I didnt vandlized korn-and you just looking for AN exuse to treat me so i wouldNT add the fact that he was a Jew and the inventor of the fax machine-dont you dare to treat me!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by --Gilisa 09:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If you had referenced it, it would have been fine. Find a reference first. If I put it as vandalism, sorry. Bsroiaadn 09:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't even report it as vandalism, just find a reference next time. I'm more concerned about the fax machine claim than the jewish ancestry claim, but both need references. To anyone reading this, the article we're talking about is Arthur Korn. Bsroiaadn 09:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my page
I didn't even notice till just now. Haha. That was the second time my page has ever been vandalized. The first time was around half an hour ago. I figured it'd happen eventually, but I didn't think the first and second time would be so close together. lol. By two different people, too. Oh well. Thanks. Bsroiaadn 15:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome...and congrats on having your page vandalized. I think it's a sure sign that you are doing a good job with vandal patrol.-- Kubigula (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Haha. Thank you. Bsroiaadn 15:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

lolz
WRY ARE YOU MEFISING WIF MY PHAGES. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.31.248.147 (talk • contribs).
 * Haahahaha. I must admit, what you left on my talk page made me laugh. But, they're nonsense. Seriously. What's the reason for them? lol. If you can give a good reason, they'll be fine. Bsroiaadn 11:52, March 8, 2007 (UTC)

Blanking my own page
Why can't I just delete my messages? Why does it have to be reverted? 24.191.99.78 16:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)User:24.191.99.78
 * Because...you're not supposed to blank pages like that. Haha. Why are you blanking it? Seriously. Do you have a good reason? Bsroiaadn 16:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Haha, fine, whatever. I am not gonna get into an arguement over this, so delete them if you please. I'm just warning you, you can get in trouble for them if the wrong person comes across it. Bsroiaadn 16:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

My Chemical Romance
There was a comment RIGHT NEXT to what you edited that said to not change it unless you discuss it on the talk page, which you did not do. Please do not edit it again until after discussing it and after a conclusion is made. Thank you. Bsroiaadn 10:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * got your message, will do. SilverNightFire 10:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Sorry if I came off as a bit of a jerk. Anyway, thanks. Bsroiaadn 10:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Nah don't worry I should have talked about it on the discussion page anyway. You ain't a jerk mate. SilverNightFire 10:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright. Have a good day. Bsroiaadn 10:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yup you too mate. SilverNightFire 10:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't know you, but..
I know what it's like. :-/ I'm sorry for your loss. I know everyone says that, but still. I hope you feel better. Bsroiaadn 17:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your words, I appreciate it a lot, specially because I don't know you, and you still cared, and dedicated a moment of your life to leave me a note. Thank you. Now, just for curiosity, how did you get to my userpage? AlexCovarrubias[[Image:Black ribbon.png|12px]] ( Let's talk! ) 17:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. And I patrol the recent changes a lot, yours came up there, and that's how I found it. Bsroiaadn 17:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Do you mind if I use any of these?
I saw this page in recent edits and got curious, so I clicked it. Do you mind if I use any of those images? I don't want to use them without your permission. Bsroiaadn 02:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, thank you for your query. They are intended to be displayed in a userpage template I have made; you can add this to your own userpage using  . I have set up an information page at User:Qxz/Ads; see that for details. You are free to use the individual images as you wish, provided you comply with the license terms for those images which have a license (as far as internal use within Wikipedia is concerned, you can do anything you want). Thanks – Qxz 02:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Some awards
I realize it won't look very good all of these coming from the same person, but you deserve them. The Randy man can 03:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow.....just...wow...I'm flattered. Haha. Thank you, very much. I feel honored. I'm adding them, now. :-) Bsroiaadn 03:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Haha. Why are you thanking me? I should be thanking you. You're the one who's been helping wikipedia, I just gave you a visual representation of that. Keep on editing. And..thank you. The Randy man can 03:12, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Warning placed on User talk:Fashelfer re: Michael Shelfer
Hello, I am a fellow RCP editor who noticed the edits on the Michael Shelfer article by his father. Fashelfer is not fully up to speed with Wikipedian policy. Still, that does not excuse his blanking and removal of maintenance tags to his son's article. I have tried to explain WP:COI as best I can to him. I would like to suggest to you that he is not yet up to a Level Three warning (although it is close depending upon an editor's interpretation of his actions). I would like to intercede for him and ask that you reduce your warning by one level. Of course, I will respect your opinion and will await your response here on your talkpage. Cheers, Ronbo76 01:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, yea, sure. No problem. I went back and reduced it right after reading this. I put it to level 2. Thanks for explaining the circumstances. I wasn't aware of all of that. Bsroiaadn 06:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it's been a busy day for me. I had a fever earlier today and then got caught up in seeing his son's article being editted. I felt like a one-armed paper hanger at times. I really appreciate your demonstration of leniency towards this user. Cheers, Ronbo76 06:58, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It's no problem man, any time. I hope you feel better and get well soon. Bsroiaadn 07:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

To Ronbo76, Bsroiaadn and RHaworth:

Thank you for your comments. I appreciate your willingness to educate me to the policies of Wikipedia. Had I had prior knowledge of the policies, I would not have posted the article to begin with. Now, I understand. Historically, I've experienced hostile attacks against a website on the Internet and also virus attacks against my own personal computer. Anti-virus software has cost me plenty over the years. When RHaworth redirected the link, applied the COI tag and made his comments, I reacted defensively because I perceived it to be a personal and hostile attack against the posting. If I own Mr. RHaworth an apology, then of course, I apologize. I would have preferred Mr. RHaworth to have had the courtesy to have sent me a brief note explaining the reason for his actions. At least that would have been the more professional way to have conducted his edit. In the future if the article remains on Wikipedia, I'll take no further action with respect to editing or changing the article in any way. If the managing editors of Wikipedia feel the article is in violation of Wikipedia convention and its continued existence on Wikipedia has no merit, then they should remove it; the sooner, the better. I would prefer its removal to having it continue to exist with the COI moniker on it. Once again, thank you for your willingness to educate me and the time it took you to do it. (FAShelfer 18:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC))

Dear Wik-Idiot
For Future Reference: Please be advised that one cannot, by definition, vandalize their own talk page. 14thArmored 17:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not. You can vandalize your own talk page. If you delete LEGITIMATE comments, it's considered vandalism. If it's stuff like people asking you questions or whatever, then it's not. But when you delete WARNINGS it is. Bsroiaadn 17:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Technically, it's okay for the user to delete warnings (especially if they came before a subsequent block and are thus moot). It's not in good taste, but it's not disallowed by policy either. Leebo T / C  17:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yea, I was reading up on it again to make sure. Sorry about that 14thArmored. Still, I'm pretty sure calling me a "wik-idiot", as you did on my talk page, is a personal attack. Bsroiaadn 18:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Apology
The ability to admit an error and learn from it is not repeat not a characteristic of a wik-idiot. I hereby apologize for my previous comment in this respect, and withdraw it without reservation. I commend you for your honesty. 14thArmored 18:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you and I accept your apology. I apologize as well for the mistake. Bsroiaadn 18:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

About deleting warning messages
Can you please show me where it says you are allowed to or where it says that it's not against the rules to? I'm trying to find it to show someone, but can't find it at the moment. I'll keep looking, but if you know where it is, please give me the link. I'll be checking your talk, so just reply here. I ask you cause you're the one who informed me that it is allowed, so I figured you might already know exactly where it states that. Bsroiaadn 05:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * From User page: On a user's own talk page, policy does not prohibit the removal of comments at that user's discretion, although archival is preferred to removal. Please note, though, that removing warnings from one's own talk page is often frowned upon.
 * So, basically, it's not a good idea, and everyone has a right to be a little annoyed by a user removing warnings, but it's not explicitly disallowed, only frowned upon. Leebo T / C  05:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright, thank you very much. Bsroiaadn 05:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Mayor Quimby
When a user repeatedly removes block notices and other relevant conversations while he is blocked, people can revert that user's edits. This sort of action constitutes "disruption", and according to Wikipedia protection policy, the user talk page can be blocked for the duration of the block. Also, Mayor Quimby made legal threats to a number of administrators involved in his block, and that is clearly against Wikipedia rules.  Nish kid 64  22:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm just gonna reply here since it wouldn't tell you if I replied in an archive. Anyway, if there were these edits going on, why not just log the page? I'm not sure if you're an admin or not, but you should have gotten one to do so if it was really that disruptive. I'm not sure how removing a block notice makes any difference, to be honest. He's blocked, removing a block notice won't let him edit anything anyway. Plus, people could always check the block logs. I wasn't aware of the legal threads, though. That is definitely unacceptable. I like your signature, by the way....just saying. Bsroiaadn 04:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I was the admin who originally blocked him. After I blocked the user, he repeatedly blanked his page and added some hateful things about other admins/editors involved, which I thought constitutes disruption. I fully protected his page and I let it expire at the time he was unblocked. He continued with his disruption on his talk page shortly thereafter and he made legal threats against me and other admins, which prompted the indefinite block. Anyway, he just basically blanked his page repeatedly, and that was the problem. When a user is blocked, he is not allowed to remove relevant discussions regarding his block or other stuff.  Nish kid 64  14:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware of any of that, I think I understand now, though. Sorry about that. Oh well, I learned from this. Bsroiaadn 18:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that
I notcied that you said I vandalized a page. It's not a big deal to me but, when I first logged in, I was on a school computer and forgot to sign out on it. I think one of the other imature kids might have done it. Middle school has some crazy 2 years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The SOAD Fan (talk • contribs)
 * It's all good man. Just be more careful about it next time. It stinks that they did that instead of just signing you out, though. Oh well, like I said, just be more careful next time so it doesn't happen again. Bsroiaadn 18:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 13:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism on Bend It Like Beckham
I was doing a vandalism patrol at the same time - the changes, while massive, do appear valid. I'd recommend undoing the rv. MojoTas 03:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * He was blanking the entire page, section by section. He's also had a history of vandalism. Bsroiaadn 04:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Who is this?
I know absolutely nothing about this show except that it seems Power Rangers was somehow adapted from this show but for American audiences. Anyway, I was wondering, in this picture what is the name of the character in the white suit with the partial-rainbow in a triangle shape on his chest and helmet? If you wouldn't mind replying on my talk page, because I might lose the link to this page somehow, that would be great. Even if it's just like "I answered your question on Talk:Super_Sentai", ya know? Anyway, I'll try to not lose this link, but I asked just incase you would be willing to. Thank you. Bsroiaadn 20:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * His name is Big One. Super Sentai has been running for 15 seasons prior to the first season PR adapted; our season 15 (Power Rangers: Operation Overdrive) was adapted from their season 30 (GoGo Sentai Boukenger).  Big One came from Sentai's second season, J.A.K.Q. Dengekitai, which aired in 1977.  He was basically a "sixth" style additional Ranger, and the very first example of the add-on Ranger formula, although he was #5 there; that season started with only four heroes.  The pic you linked was a teamup with multiple heroes from previous seasons; it's where the idea for the US episode Forever Red came from.  He showed back up for the ep.  Arrow 20:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * D:— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 20:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Haha. Thank you both very much. :-) Bsroiaadn 20:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Heads Up
I answered your question on Talk:Super Sentai. :) Arrow 20:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Super Sentai
The guy in the white suit is Soukichi Banba or "Big One" from J.A.K.Q. Dengekitai. He never appeared in Power Rangers because the series he is from was started in 1977. In case you are curious, the other characters are Yuusuke Amamiya/Red Falcon from Choujuu Sentai Liveman, Miku Imamura/MegaPink from Denji Sentai Megaranger, Gouki/GingaBlue of Seijuu Sentai Gingaman, and Daimon Tatsumi/GoYellow of Kyuukyuu Sentai GoGo-V.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 20:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Fight for Marty!
Thanks for fixing the other parts about the record in Martin Brodeur. I forgot about those. I'm glad someone realized I didn't fix them. Bsroiaadn 01:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming you are a Devils fan seeing as we were both editing the page a second after the game ended. Thanks for the team loyalty and we both know that "Marty's better!" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JRWalko (talk • contribs).
 * lol. Yup, very much so. I was sitting there watching the game...my heart was beating so hard. haha. And yea, Marty's better. :-) Bsroiaadn 02:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

How is Hasek better than Brodeur?
I saw you saying to leave a message on your talk page if I wanted to know more...which I do. lol. I'm not criticizing, I am completely open to new opinions. Of course, Brodeur will always be my favorite but Hasek is very talented. Just not sure if he's better than Marty. Also, if you could please reply on my talk page, I'm gonna copy this over to that anyway, so just reply in the section of the same name. Bsroiaadn 05:44, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, ha, I give you some reasons.


 * 1) Exciting to watch because of his unique style
 * 2) First and only goalie to win the MVP twice and consecutively
 * 3) Still performing well at 42 (ex. 35 save shutout @ Columbus) .913 SV% isn't too shabby
 * 4) Most saves in a shutout victory - 42 (Brodeur had 39, but oh well)
 * 5) First goalie since '74 to have a GAA below 2.00
 * 6) First european goalie to have GAA below 2.00 as well
 * 7) Personal best shutout streak of 181 minutes, 17 seconds (pretty good)
 * 8) Most shutouts in a month - 6
 * 9) First goaltender to win the Lester B. Pearson Award
 * 10) Dominated the 1990's with Vezinas (6) - is 2nd in NHL history
 * 11) In a 14 year span he led NHL in SV% six times
 * 12) And finally, oldest goaltender to have a 30 win season

I know Brodeur has more records (record wise, not trophies andd stuff above) but it's because he played tons more games, and in his 90's had Scott Stevens, Scott Niedermayer and Brian Rafalski for his defense to back Marty up. However Hasek, he didn't have a good team with him (only Peca, LaFontaine for 2 years). No all-star d-men there. I'm fine with Brodeur, it's just that when people thinks Hasek is terrible. Okay sure Hasek has the trio of Schiender, Lidstrom and Chelios but that was just for a couple of years. The only reason why I don't like Brodeur is because he's better than Hasek in stats this year, but actually I look at in a different way--if Brodeur was 42 would he be performing as good as Hasek right now? So It is hard to compare the goalies, from the gap of GP so I look at it as awards, SV% records and stuff like that. As long as the Brodeur fan likes Hasek I'm fine with it. If they hate Hasek I'll try to think of Hasek's records and some of Brodeur's bad statistics, and you know it just to get back at 'em, right?)--Hasek is the best 14:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You have some good points, now here's a couple in reponse to yours (numbered the same..but I may have missed some):


 * 1) Brodeur is also exciting to watch.
 * 2) Brodeur's never won an MVP trophy, so Hasek got him there.
 * 3) Brodeur's only 34.
 * 4) That's impressive, but like you said...Brodeur was close to that
 * 5) Brodeur has had the same amount of below 2.00 GAA's as Hasek, two of them. Brodeur, though, had them consecutively (1996-1998). Marty wasn't the first since '74, but still.
 * 6) Marty's not european, so I can't respond to that.
 * 7) Not sure of Marty's shutout streak record.
 * 8) I don't know Marty's record for shutouts in a single month, but in this season he had 3 shutouts in a month in October, December,  January, and February.
 * 9) Not sure if Marty was Goalie to win any awards.
 * 10) Marty's led the GAA in a single seasons playoffs 3 times. Led the league in wins in a single season 7 times (8 when this season is over, although Luongo may tie..so we'll see). Led the league in shut outs in a single season 3 times. Also has the record of most shutouts in a single playoff year (7, 2002-03 season playoffs) As well as some other records that you can find at Martin Brodeur, not gonna list them all. I know Dominik has a lot, too, though.
 * 11) Marty is the only goalie to score a game-winning goal.

I would keep going, but I have to go now...pre-easter stuff. Haha. By the way, I'm not putting Hasek down..he's definitely very talented. Bsroiaadn 00:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Well again a lot of his records are milestones were ex. wins, shutouts because he played more games. What do you mean by #9, of course he won awards. Anyway I have a few more reasons:


 * Hasek also got bronze and gold in olympics, not just the gold + plus many europe medals
 * sure Brodeur had more SO's in plyoffs but only by one.
 * Nominated for MVP another 3 times - Pearson once
 * And about the SV% fact, the Sabres were always getting outshot year after year, wrote from a page on the web.

So again, you can't really compare the two because of all the differences. The only reason why people hate Hasek is because he's too old, but I don't think so. In fact, I think he's the oldest active goalie in NHL history. Brodeur is also talented as well in fact they are pretty much tied, I guess. (I also have to see my cousins for Easter tomorrow, too.) --Hasek is the best 02:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Sports in New Jersey category
Can you tell me what your reasoning is behind deleting from New Jersey Devils? I won't re-add it until you tell me your reason. Unless it takes a week, then I will re-add it. I don't see any reason why it would be taken out. Also, could you please reply on my talk page? Thank you. Bsroiaadn 00:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Harley Quinn Smith
An editor has nominated Harley Quinn Smith, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Favorite NHL team
I hope you don't mind, I've been wondering this for a while. I've seen you editing (or at least writing on the talk pages) a couple NHL teams articles, if you don't mind me asking...who/what is your favorite team? This won't make any difference, really....it's just out of curiosity. Bsroiaadn 20:37, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The Montreal Canadiens; though lately there hasn't been much to cheer about. GoodDay 21:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, alright. Thanks. If I remember correctly....all I can say is "Good luck next year". :-/ Sorry. :-/ (My favorite team is the New Jersey Devils if you were wondering.) Bsroiaadn 03:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)