User talk:Bstrom650

March 2015
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Jehovah's Witnesses. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Phantom Tech (talk) 03:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

My efforts were to correct old information and clarify misstatements made in ignorance by others. As a practicing Jehovah's Witness, I only wish to present an unbiased, factual representation on the subject, leaving the reader to make his own conclusion based on current and accurate information. There is an abundance of opinion already in place, which an encyclopedia does not require to be a valid source of information. My removal of false information is an effort to maintain a truthful open view of this subject matter. My statements are verifiable.
 * It was entirely inappropriate to insert your own editorial opinion into the article content of the article, as you did here. Additionally, your claim that the reports were 40 years old is false; though one of the sources was from 1975, the other material you removed was from sources published in 1993 and 2012.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 05:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)