User talk:Bt noy

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of The Edington Line
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Edington Line, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Complete hoax

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of London Underground 2013 Stock
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article London Underground 2013 Stock, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paddenswick Road tube station
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Paddenswick Road tube station, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No need for an article on a "proposed" station on a "proposed" rail line. Also, no indication of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Spiesr (talk) 17:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The following articles have also been tagged for the same reason:Heathfield Terrace tube station, Hammersmith Grove tube station, Rylett Road tube station, Stamford Gardens tube station, Richmond extensions of the Central Line. Spiesr (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Tramlink extension to Brixton
I have reverted your changes to Streatham railway station, Streatham Hill railway station and Brixton tube station as there have never been worked up-proposals to extend Tramlink further north than the Streatham "hub" site - just to the south of Streatham station.--Lang rabbie 20:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Please don't create false articles, such as the railway extension articles.
Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. --  At am a chat 00:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richmond extensions of the Central Line
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Richmond extensions of the Central Line, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Richmond extensions of the Central Line
I have nominated Richmond extensions of the Central Line, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Richmond extensions of the Central Line. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --  At am a chat 23:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)