User talk:Btakacs1

Don't be discouraged
Your good faith addition to the article Febreze was reverted (not by me). To ensure that your addition stays, you need to find a WP:RS that reports the facts you added. The rules for determining "reliable sources" are somewhat non-obvious to a new editor. Please follow the links provided, read the documentation, and try again. Cheers! Reify-tech (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Reify-tech, I have no idea how to reply to you so I hope typing here is what you are supposed to do. Thank you very much for your communication. I suppose there really is no "reliable" source in this matter as defined by WIKI. Unfortunately, P&G knows exactly what the ingredients are but they are not obliged to disclose all their ingredients in the way foods are by the FDA. If they don't disclose it, I can't think of a research group or an analytical lab, which seem to be the only "reliable" sources accepted, that is going to do this for free. The Environmental Working Group seems to be the closest, and if their findings are not accepted, I guess that is it. My husband runs a chemistry research group at a university. Maybe he can shoot some of the Febreze into a GC and verify acetaldehyde, but it would probably wreck the GC column. Thanks again. Btakacs1 (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC)