User talk:Btarski

your message
To me was truncated. However I can perhaps partially reply: my bot is not generally tagging articles it is mainly dating existing tags to help with the cleanup effort. If that doesn't answer your partly asked question, please drop the rest of the question off at may talk page. Rich Farmbrough, 11:00 20 December 2006 (GMT).
 * Which article? Rich Farmbrough, 20:01 20 December 2006 (GMT).
 * Hi, looks basically OK to me, added the tag attention, SmackBot merely dated it, and replaced it with a synonym. Rgds, [[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich] Farmbrough, 20:17 20  December 2006 (GMT).

Nomina Anatomica
The term "cleanup" may be more than confusing...:-7 The content of the article is fine - it just needed wikifying (adding wikilinks to other articles like User:Rich Farmbrough did) and still needs a good category. If you think some subjects in the article would justify their own article (organizations, for example), those would be a good candidates for a wikilink. Otherwise fine. Welcome to Wikipedia - Skysmith 06:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Very good points. An average acronym always has more than one meaning and wikipedia editors disambiguate various links to proper pages all the time. Others sometimes make redirects to most obvious (to them) articles too hastily.


 * You could turn the FCAT redirect page (click the small link below the title of the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test) into a disambiguation page (something like this):

"Acronym FCAT can refer to

(possibly others, in alphabetical order)
 * Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology, former name of FICAT, the Federative International Committee on Anatomical Terminology
 * Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test

"


 * You could do the same thing with JNA.


 * Category could be anatomy or anatomical terminology. Category should be the most exlusive you can find or think of, to avoid clutter.


 * Note that Wikipedia has many articles about nominally obscure topics but that does not make them any less important. Creating red links is meant to encourage editors to write articles about those subjects (I have my own list of missing topics linked from my userpage, for example). If you know any experts, anatomists or physicians you know were instrumental in forming the Nomina Anatomica, you might write about them. - Skysmith 20:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Audio files on Wikipedia
Without people like you, I doubt we'd have as much history as we now do.

I can see how it can be archived on Wikipedia, but I believe the most appropriate place for you is the Internet Archive. Their goal is similar to Wikipedia's - universal access to all human knowledge - except their methodology is a giant media archive and library, instead of a condensed encyclopedia. If you look in their audio section, there is a perfect, specific audio poetry subsection.

Create an account there ("getting a library card"), and follow their directions to contribute.

-- Znode (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Berryman
Hi,

I read that you have some John Berryman recordings on CD, are you interested in selling a copy of these? If so would you be able to contact at ben.r.parker@gmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.71.208.58 (talk) 18:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC).

License tagging for Image:Torricelli Hyperbola.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Torricelli Hyperbola.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 22:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Sensory pathways
I really like the Sensory Pathway flowchart you added to the Trigeminal Nerve topic. Do you have a similar flowchart for the Descending Pathways?

Regards,

Jan Kokavec —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkokavec (talk • contribs) 14:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

File:Sensory Homunculus.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sensory Homunculus.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Onion Skin.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Onion Skin.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Trammel.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trammel.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 09:25, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Brainstem abducens
Can you move to commons ? Thank you! --Ceccomaster (talk) 09:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Abducens_nerve.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Abducens_nerve.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hampton11235 (talk) 04:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Serrated-face nut.png


The file File:Serrated-face nut.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Helical lockwasher.png


The file File:Helical lockwasher.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Castellated Nut.PNG


The file File:Castellated Nut.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cycloid generation.png


The file File:Cycloid generation.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused. Superseded by File:Cycloid f.gif"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 02:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Onion Skin.png


The file File:Onion Skin.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused image, no context to determine possible future use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 11:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)