User talk:Bthomp34/sandbox

By December of this quarter, I will have expanded this article in it's breadth of content and increased the organization of the article. While the article currently has accurate and well-organized information, many gaps surrounding Chung's professional work is omitted or only briefly discussed when her work is acclaimed for its value within her field. The majority of my work will be adding this information and providing reliable sources to provide credibility to her accomplishments.

Wendy Chung Article Review
Hi there! Great job so far on your article! I think the information you have on her early life and education so far is great! One thing I think you could add on is more information on the research she is doing and the influence it has on medicine, or any honors she has had like awards/recognitions. Other than that, great job! Sstrou01 (talk) 21:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
Your article is off to a good start! Here are a couple of things I was thinking about when reviewing it:

1. Are you planning on adding an image of Wendy?

2. It might be nice to add a little more info about Chung's 2014 TED Talk. You could provide more context besides just the title.

Best of luck with the rest of your editing!

Meghancmalloy (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Meghancmalloy

- Response for Peer review on Wendy Chung's Wikipedia page talk section

Polishing of Work
This week, I continued to update my information on my page, including beginning to move information from a word document onto my sandbox for formatting and adding additional subcategories on my sandbox page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bthomp34 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 30 November 2018 (UTC)