User talk:Btmomo

August 2009
I have reverted your edits to Mark Potok. Much of the material you added was very unencyclopedic and does not pertain to Potok--the material on the SPLC does not belong here, the stuff about statistical bias comes out of nowhere--and seems to have been copied from somewhere else (are those footnote numbers, in brackets?). I agree wholeheartedly that the article needs work, and I'll do some of it, but this is not the way to go. BTW, I also don't agree with using Huffingtonpost as a reliable source. I thank you for your contribution and your attempt to bring some fairness to the article, and hope you will contribute again. Drmies (talk) 02:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)