User talk:Btroop

February 2018
When something you add to an article is removed, with the reason given being that it was "unsourced" — I.e., it has no citation from a reliable source so that the information could be verified — and was "POV", i.e. showed a "point of view" or opinion (see WP:NPOV), then do not simply restore it without fixing the problems, as you did at Jay Larrañaga.That is called edit warring and it can get you blocked from editing. You also ignored a large warning notice at the top of the editing page, not to add unsourced information.

So, do not re-add that information unless it has a citation from a reliable source to support it, and make sure that it is written in a neutral way.

Please also note that Wikipedia has little, if any, interest in what the subject of an article has to say about themselves and is based upon what has been written about that person in independent reliable sources. An article does not 'belong' to its subject; it is not their page and they can have very little input into its content.

As you have indicated a connection to the subject you need to read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the necessary disclosures. This is not optional you must do this to continue making edits, which should ideally be suggested on the article talk page using the  template. This is to ensure the neutrality of the article. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)