User talk:Bubbagump1234

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Bluntly put, don't copy/paste texts from external websites to Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:28, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

It may possibly be a need to revoke admin privileges from Richard Harvey, KrakatoaKatie & Materialscientist (talk) and others. It would seem there are too many admins for wikipedia. They use their status to bully editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubbagump1234 (talk • contribs)

This account is blocked because of block evasion. When you get blocked then you're not supposed to just make a new account and continue editing. You're supposed to request an unblock on your original account. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 13:32, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

The editor claims not to remember their previous account which would technically be a good excuse for not logging into that account instead of making a new one. But this current account is blocked as another account of User:Gospel veracity -- is this true or not? — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * To be honest I don't see the similarity but apparently a checkuser confirmed it. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * At least that's what the tag says, but was it actually confirmed? — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:10, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Actually I am not, and have never claimed to be, an Administrator. Nor was I involved in discussing citations. I merely noted that the user stated in his post:- Here that he had been blocked previously and pointed out that he was obviously editing as a sockpuppet of an unknown to me indef blocked user, for block evasion. However Materialscientist, the admin who blocked this sockpuppet, is one of the few admins with Checkuser rights and has obviously confirmed the two accounts are the same person and blocked this sockpuppet, along with another that he has created, see Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gospel veracity. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)